CCRC is back in action!

After nearly six months offline because of repeated malware attacks, the Collateral Consequences Resource Center website is back live — entirely rebuilt and ready again to provide web-based legal resources to the public free of charge.

We are especially happy to be able to reintroduce our flagship resource, the Restoration of Rights Project (RRP), which was hard hit by the malware attacks, mysteriously losing both data and functionality. Those who use and rely on the RRP know its value in collecting and analyzing laws in each state that aim to mitigate the adverse effects of a criminal record, through civil rights restoration, executive pardon, judicial record clearing, and fair chance employment and licensing. The RRP also includes 50-state comparison charts for each of these four areas of research.

Our work on the RRP has been supported in recent years by generous grants from Arnold Ventures, and we have made a point of keeping its resources updated in real time as new laws are enacted. We have also published specialized research reports based on RRP research, most recently on loss and restoration of firearm rights, as well as annual reports on newly enacted laws.

Reconstructing the RRP’s hundreds of web pages has been the work of many weeks for me and Beth Johnson, who for the past two years has been my right hand in keeping the RRP up to date and accurate. Fortunately, we have been able to restore almost all of the material that was lost or compromised, and we have taken the opportunity to add new laws and expand areas of current interest such as non-conviction dispositions and record relief for human trafficking survivors.

Beth and I have had time to consider the importance of the RRP project, and to appreciate the work that goes into its upkeep. The fact is that maintaining the RRP has been a labor of love since I began it more than 20 years ago. It also requires a love of labor, because this is careful, detailed work, done behind the scenes, that can frequently be tedious and seem repetitious. We worry a lot about striking a useful balance between including too much and not enough technical detail, given our varied audience.

We know that there is no other resource that seeks to bring this body of law together in one place. And, over the years, we have seen and heard enough feedback – from lawyers and journalists and members of the public – to be confident that the information is being used in meaningful ways to benefit the justice-impacted and their advocates, and that it does benefit them. We have also been told that the RRP’s comparative resources are particularly useful to legislators and other policymakers looking to improve their laws. These many anecdotal moments have been enough to sustain Beth and me in the rebuilding effort.

In the end, we are convinced that this real-time research needs to continue.  So we are returning to the RRP reinvigorated, with gratitude to the many people who have reached out while the site was offline, as well as to those who have in the past relied on and shared the work. Our hope simply is that the resource is and will remain useful to the people seeking to understand and address the problem of collateral consequences.

In this spirit, we hope that those of you who have used CCRC’s resources over the years, as well as those who are being introduced to them for the first time, will take a few minutes to fill in the short survey below to assess the usefulness of the site’s resources, and to let us know what you’d like to see us include in the future.


Restoration of Rights Project (RRP) Feedback Survey

Help us improve this resource.

The Restoration of Rights Project is committed to providing accurate, clear, and useful information to the public free of charge. Your feedback helps us improve the site and better meet the needs of people who rely on it.

This survey takes about 2 minutes. You can take the survey here.

 

Restoration of firearm rights after conviction: Findings and recommendations

We are pleased to publish an updated version of our report on state laws governing loss and restoration of firearm rights after a criminal conviction: Restoration of Firearm Rights After Conviction: A National Survey and Recommendations for Reform.

This report, a version of which was originally published in June of 2025, finds that felony dispossession laws in most states extend well beyond what is necessary to advance public safety objectives, and that the process for regaining lost rights tends to be difficult to navigate if accessible at all.

Our report argues that broad categorical dispossession laws are more vulnerable to constitutional challenge under the Second Amendment where a state does not provide an easily accessible process for restoring rights based on an individualized assessment of public safety risk. It makes a number of recommendations to this end, which are summarized at the end of this post.  

Since our report was first published six months ago, there have been some changes in state laws warranting an update. More significant, however, in July 2025 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) proposed to revive a long-dormant program under 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) for restoring rights lost under the federal dispossession statute. Originally administered by ATF, the revived program will be administered by DOJ’s Office of the Pardon Attorney. We decided that this development was important to cover in what is otherwise a report on state law, because of the close relationship between state and federal dispossession laws.

In a related development, DOJ seems to agree with our report’s argument that the existence of an accessible restoration mechanism may cure constitutional deficiency in a dispossession statute. Thus, the U.S. Solicitor General relied upon the renewed availability of administrative relief from federal restrictions under § 925(c) in arguing that the Supreme Court should decline to grant review in the case of a Utah woman federally dispossessed because of a dated conviction for food stamp fraud. See Brief for the Respondent in Opposition, Vincent v. Bondi, No. 24-1155, at 9 (Aug.11, 2025). For a review of Second Amendment cases on the radar of the Supreme Court this Term, see Kelsey Dallas, Second Amendment in the spotlight, SCOTUSblog (Nov. 13, 2025).

Read more

Illinois enacts Nation’s broadest automatic sealing law

NOTE: The Clean Slate Act was signed into law by the Governor on January 16, 2026 (P.A. 104-0459).

***

On October 30, 2025, the Illinois General Assembly approved HB 1836, making Illinois the 13th “Clean Slate” state. Illinois will also have the broadest automated record-sealing program of them all.  

The Governor’s signature will launch the implementation toward an automated record-sealing process to bridge the “second chance gap” for an estimated 2.2 million people with an Illinois criminal record.  Guided by the work of the Illinois Clean Slate Task Force, sealing of existing conviction and non-conviction records is scheduled to begin in January 2029.

Illinois’ law will apply to most of the misdemeanor and felony convictions for which petition-based sealing is already authorized, with the same short waiting period of 3 years from the end of sentence. In addition, beginning January 1, 2029, Illinois will join the large group of states for which sealing of non-conviction records is mandatory and accomplished immediately upon a favorable case disposition.

Building on a Legacy of Progress

Illinois already leads the nation with one of the most expansive petition-based sealing laws. Since 2017, when lawmakers passed HB 2373, most felony conviction records have been eligible for sealing relief, after a comparatively brief waiting period of just three years from the end of a sentence. That law marked a turning point, expanding eligibility from only nine felony convictions to nearly all, with just a few exceptions.

The new Illinois Clean Slate Act builds directly on the foundation laid by the 2017 law. Like the petition-based process, automated sealing will apply to nearly all conviction records (unless already excluded under the petition-based process) after a three-year period from the end of sentence, except for a limited set of additional ineligible offenses involving the most serious felonies. Even these additional convictions ineligible for automatic relief, however, will remain eligible for petition-based relief. Details of the existing laws and new Clean Slate legislation can be found in the Illinois profile from the Restoration of Rights Project.

Read more

Update on federal firearms restoration program

Last spring, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its intention to revive a long-dormant program to remove federal restrictions on firearm possession, including for those with a criminal record.  In July DOJ published for comment a proposed rule that would, when finalized, accomplish this for people who are determined to pose no public safety risk. See 18 U.S.C. § 925(c). See Trump’s Justice Department aims to restore gun rights for nonviolent offenders.

The comment period closed on October 20, and it is therefore possible that a final rule will be published at any time to launch the revived program. This will open the door, for the first time in more than 30 years, to many individuals who have been unable to regain their firearm rights because of their criminal record. It is anticipated that thousands of people will want to apply for this relief, which will be administered by the Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney.

Read more

Virginia enacts significant record reforms in 2025

Note: We are very pleased to publish a summary of the several significant record reforms enacted by Virginia in 2025, prepared by Rob Poggenklass. Rob is executive director of Justice Forward Virginia, a public defender-led criminal justice policy advocacy organization. He was deputy director of CCRC in 2022. 

The Commonwealth of Virginia has continued to make significant progress toward reducing the collateral consequences of criminal conviction, although a closely divided government has meant that reforms have been more incremental in recent years. Here are the several new laws that Virginia enacted during the 2025 legislative session:

  • Occupational licensing reforms;
  • Expansion of vacatur eligibility for victims of human trafficking;
  • Two bills easing employment restrictions for people convicted of “barrier crimes”; and
  • Technical updates and policy changes to the major 2021 record sealing law, which will take effect July 1, 2026;

In addition, the General Assembly took the first step toward amending the Virginia Constitution to ensure that a felony conviction results in loss of the right to vote (and potentially other civil rights) only during actual incarceration.

These six major new authorities are described below. I expect that the Virginia General Assembly’s exemplary performance in enacting these important new provisions will be in for recognition in CCRC’s annual round-up of new record reforms.

Read more