The Minnesota Constitution provides for a Board of Pardons composed of the governor, the attorney general and the chief justice of the supreme court, whose “powers and duties shall be defined and regulated by law.” The pardon board is required to report to the legislature annually. Per a 2023 reform, the board’s decisions need no longer be unanimous, but the governor must always been in the majority for a grant to be effective. The board is now advised and assisted by a 9-person Clemency Review Commission, appointed in equal numbers by the three board members, which investigates applications and holds hearings to develop recommendations to the board. Eligibility for a pardon requires five crime-free years from final discharge, and waivers of the eligibility waiting period may be granted. A pardon restores all rights and effectively “nullifies” a conviction by setting it aside, and it automatically expunges the record. The pardon process includes a public hearing before the Commission that advises the Board, with notice to officials and victims, and includes the possibility of an expedited review process. In the past, the pardon process in Minnesota has yielded few grants and applications have not been encouraged, but the new process is expected both to encourage more applications and to yield more grants.
Restoration of Rights Project (RRP)
- Loss & restoration of civil/firearms rights
- Pardon policy & practice
- Expungement, sealing & other record relief
- Criminal record in employment, licensing & housing
RRP: State-By-State Guides
RRP: 50-State Comparisons
Restoration of Firearm Rights After Conviction: A National Survey and Recommendations for Reform (Dec. 2025)

50-state comparisons
About the Restoration of Rights Project
The Restoration of Rights Project (RRP) is a project of the Collateral Consequences Resource Center in partnership with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Legal Aid & Defender Association, National HIRE Network, Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, and Paper Prisons Initiative. Launched in 2017, the RRP is an online resource containing detailed state-by-state analyses of the law and practice in each U.S. jurisdiction relating to restoration of rights and status following arrest or conviction. Jurisdictional “profiles” cover areas such as loss and restoration of civil rights and firearms rights, judicial and executive mechanisms for avoiding or mitigating collateral consequences, and provisions addressing non-discrimination in employment, licensing, and housing. In addition to the jurisdictional profiles, RRP materials include a set of 50-state comparison charts that make it possible to see national patterns in restoration laws and policies. Short “postcard” summaries of the law in each state serve as a gateway to the more detailed information in the profiles, and provide a snapshot of applicable law in each state.
Originally published in 2006 by CCRC Executive Director Margaret Love, the research in the RRP has been kept up to date and substantially expanded over the years, and it is summarized in an appendix to the treatise on collateral consequences published jointly by NACDL and Thompson Reuters (West). It is intended as a resource for practitioners in all phases of the criminal justice system, for courts, for civil practitioners assisting clients whose court-imposed sentence has exposed them to additional civil penalties, for policymakers and advocates interested in reentry and reintegration of convicted persons, and for the millions of Americans with a criminal record who are seeking to put their past behind them.
These resources may be republished as long as appropriate attribution is given to the RRP as its source.




