Tag: Wayne Logan

New collection of research on sex offense registration

Cambridge University Press has just published a new book, edited by Professors Wayne A. Logan and J.J. Prescott, containing chapters from the nation’s leading social science researchers on the many important empirical questions surrounding sex offense registration and community notification (SORN).  Since SORN’s origin in the early 1990s, basic questions have existed regarding its effects, including whether it actually achieves its intended purpose of reducing sexual offending. SORN surely numbers among the most significant social control methods of the past several decades.  Although the Supreme Court in 2003 rejected two constitutional challenges to SORN laws (Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe and Smith v. Doe), of late courts, including the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Does v. Snyder, 2016), have cast a more critical eye, invalidating new generation SORN laws that have become more onerous and expansive in their reach. An updated review of caselaw from Professor Logan on SORN and other collateral consequences triggered primarily by sex offenses will be included in the forthcoming fourth edition of Love, Roberts & Logan, Collateral Consequences of Arrest & Conviction: Law Policy & Practice (West/NACDL, 4th ed. 2021). Also, as readers might be aware, the American Law Institute, as part of its overhaul of the Model Penal Code’s sex offense-related provisions, has tentatively approved a slate of reforms advocating a vastly reduced approach to registration and discontinuation of community notification. (We plan a post about the MPC’s important new model in the near future.) The Logan and Prescott collection promises to be an invaluable resource as policy-makers begin to consider whether SORN laws should be retooled or perhaps done away with altogether. Here’s the SSRN abstract for the book: Despite being in existence for over a quarter century, costing multiple millions of dollars and affecting the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals, sex offender registration and community notification (SORN) laws have yet to be subject to a book-length treatment of their empirical dimensions, examining their premises, coverage, and impact on public safety. This volume, edited by Professors Wayne A. Logan and J.J. Prescott, assembles the leading researchers in the field to provide an in-depth look at what have come to be known as “Megan’s Laws,” offering a social science-based analysis of one of the most important and controversial criminal justice system initiatives undertaken in modern times. The editors attach the title page, table of contents, and preface of the volume. Here’s the SSRN link https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3865283 and a link to the Cambridge website https://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/law/criminal-law/sex-offender-registration-and-community-notification-laws-empirical-evaluation?format=HB. For information on relief from sex offense registration obligations, see our 50-state chart on the topic: https://ccresourcecenter.org/state-restoration-profiles/50-state-comparison-relief-from-sex-offender-registration-obligations/. Read more

New edition of collateral consequences treatise now available

The 2018-2019 edition of the West/NACDL treatise on collateral consequences is now available for purchase, at a publisher’s promotional discount. Wayne A. Logan has joined Margaret Love and Jenny Roberts as a co-author of this comprehensive resource: Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction: Law, Policy & Practice. This third edition of the treatise has been entirely updated, and includes new material on regulation of criminal background checking; consideration of collateral consequences in the criminal case; laws providing for restoration of rights and status, including in employment and occupational licensing; and, recent court decisions on sex offender registration and related penalties.  Appendices include detailed state-by-state analysis of restoration laws, and other primary source materials.  The full table of contents for this 1048-page book is available here.  The publisher describes the book as follows:  Today, many millions of Americans have a criminal record of some kind, potentially triggering a vast array of highly burdensome and stigmatizing consequences that can have life-long debilitating effects. This volume provides comprehensive discussion and analysis of these after-effects of the nation’s ongoing “tough on crime” policies, ranging from loss of civil rights and employment opportunities, to registration and residency restrictions.  It serves as a single go-to resource for practicing lawyers, judges, and policymakers as they negotiate the often-complex and sometimes-obscure statutes and regulations that come into play as a result of arrest and conviction. Highlighted features: Describes specific types of consequences, including firearms dispossession, licensing and contracting bars, travel restrictions, immigration consequences, and sex offender registration Addresses legal and ethical duties of counsel and courts Analyzes constitutional law aspects of collateral consequences Explains varied methods of rights restoration and preservation in different U.S. jurisdictions Covers criminal practice-related issues (charging, negotiating pleas, sentencing, appeals and collateral relief) Addresses access to criminal records and regulation of criminal background checking Discusses current and possible future law reform efforts (ALI/MPC, state initiatives, etc.) Appendices contain summaries of state and federal laws on restoration of and status, and key documents on law reform proposals. The book is available for purchase, currently at a discounted price of $186.30 for paperback or e-book (though the discounted rate may not be shown on the West catalogue page).  For the discounted rate, please call the publisher at 800-328-9352, and press “2” to place an order. The book is also available on-line on Westlaw.  Endorsements from Bryan Stevenson, Jeremy Travis, Judge John Gleeson, and Jo-Ann Wallace can be seen here.     Read more

Relief from sex offender registration and notification requirements

Update (5/14/15): We have published a 50 state chart detailing relief from registration requirements on the Restoration of Rights page. The chart is based in part on Wayne Logan’s work. You can find the chart at this link.   Wayne Logan has summarized his research on relief from sex offender registration and community notification requirements for a forthcoming Wisconsin Law Review article in an excerpt from the second edition of Love, Roberts & Klingele, Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction: Law, Policy & Practice (West/NACDL, 2d ed. 2015)(forthcoming). This is the first of many tidbits from the book that will appear in this space from time to time: 2:42. Sex offense-related collateral consequences — Constitutional challenges to registration and community notification laws:  post-application challenges Given the extended potential duration of registration and community notification (RCN) application, ranging from ten years to life, the question naturally arises over whether relief from its requirements and burdens can be attained at some point. While the federal Adam Walsh Act allows states to provide relief to registrants with a “clean record” for ten years,[1] states typically afford only very limited opportunity to registrants to exit registries. South Carolina is most limited, offering no opportunity to petition for relief from lifetime registration and community notification;[2] only a pardon will trigger removal, and then only if the pardon is based “on a finding of not guilty specifically stated.”[3] In other states, opportunity for relief is only somewhat broadened, to include such sub-populations as juvenile offenders and those convicted of less serious offenses.[4] In still others, the eligibility group is again broadened, and petition is allowed after a period of years (e.g., 25),[5] and in several states select registrant groups can seek early relief.[6] Early relief, however, can be less than it seems:  in Hawaii, for instance, only lifetime registrants can petition for early relief—after forty years on the registry;[7] ten- and 25-year class registrants must satisfy their terms.[8] Petition criteria and procedures vary considerably among the states,[9] and to date the lack of opportunity for relief has not triggered constitutional concern.  In In re Jimmy M.W.,[10] for instance, the petitioner was placed on the West Virginia registry in 1998 as a result of pleading no contest to sexual abuse in the third degree, a misdemeanor, for touching the breast of a fourteen-year-old girl.  Because the conviction involved a minor, the state required that the petitioner register for his lifetime.[11] In 2012, after remaining compliant with registration requirements for fourteen years, and marrying the victim and raising children with her, petitioner’s effort to be removed from the registry was rebuffed by a state trial court.[12] The state’s highest court affirmed, reasoning that state law did not extend any opportunity for relief to lifetime registrants such as petitioner, and neither the U.S. nor West Virginia Constitutions required any such opportunity.[13] Finally, to date, courts have been disinclined to conclude that the effects of RCN qualify as “custody” sufficient to trigger federal habeas corpus coverage.[14]   [1] Under the Adam Walsh Act, the following registrants can have their statutorily designated RCN periods reduced: (i) Tier I (usually subject to 15-year period) reduced by five years if “clean record” for ten years (ten-year total duration) and Tier III juveniles (usually subject to lifetime period) reduced to twenty-five years if “clean record” for twenty-five years (twenty-five year total duration). See 42 U.S.C.A. §16915(b)(2),(3). [2] S.C. Code § 23-3-460 (2014). [3] S.C. Code § 23-3-430(F). [4] See, e.g., Ala. Code § 15-20A-24 (2014); S.D. Code § 22-24B-19 (2014); Neb. Code § 29-4005(1)(b)(i) (2014). [5] See, e.g., Ariz. Stat. § 13-3821(D); D.C. Code 22-4002 (2014); Va. Code § 9.1-910 (2014). [6] See, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 943.0435(11) (2014); N.D. Stat. § 12.1-32-14(16); Wyo. Stat. § 7-19-304 (2014). [7] Haw. Rev. Stat. § 846E-10(e). [8]. Id. at § 846E-10(b). [9] See Wayne A. Logan, Database Infamia: Exit from the Sex Offender Registries, 2015 Wis. L. Rev.___ (2015)(forthcoming). [10] 2014 WL 24042298 (W. Va. 2014). [11] Id. at *1. [12] Id. at *3. [13] Id. [14] See Wayne A. Logan, Federal Habeas in the Information Age, 85 Minn. L. Rev. 147 (2000). Read more