Tag: Scholarship round-up

Scholarship round-up IV

It’s time for another scholarship round-up! A more complete collection of scholarship on issues relating to collateral consequences and restoration of rights can be found on our “Books & Articles” page.  (Abstracts follow list of articles.) Past round-ups here. Measuring the Creative Plea Bargain Thea Johnson, University of Maine School of Law Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 92, 901 (2017) Dismissals as Justice Anna Roberts, Seattle University School of Law Alabama Law Review (Forthcoming) Unstitching Scarlet Letters? Prosecutorial Discretion and Expungement Brian M. Murray, University of Pennsylvania Law School 86 Fordham Law Review (Forthcoming) Criminal Record Questions in the Era of “Ban the Box” Mike Vuolo, Ohio State University Sarah Lageson, Rutgers University Christopher Uggen, University of Minnesota 16 Criminology & Public Policy 139 (2017) The President’s Role in Advancing Criminal Justice Reform Barack Obama 130 Harvard Law Review 811, 838 (2017) Obama’s Clemency Legacy: An Assessment Margaret Colgate Love 29 Federal Sentencing Reporter (forthcoming 2017) Designed to Fail: The President’s Deference to the Department of Justice in Advancing Criminal Justice Reform Rachel E. Barkow, New York University School of Law Mark William Osler, University of St. Thomas – School of Law (Minnesota) William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 59 (2017) Expungement, […]

Read more

Scholarship round-up III

A number of new and interesting articles on collateral consequences have come to our attention since we published our first big scholarship round-up only weeks ago. We provide information, links, and abstracts on these pieces below. A more complete collection of scholarship on issues relating to collateral consequences can be found on our “Books & Articles” page. “Can We Forgive Those Who Batter? Proposing an End to the Collateral Consequences of Civil Domestic Violence Cases” Joann Sahl, University of Akron School of Law 100 Marquette Law Review 527 (2017) Each year courts issue more than 1 million civil domestic violence protection orders (CPOs). Although most of these orders will expire in one or two years, their impact often remains for much longer periods. The expired CPOs continue to carry stigma and significant prejudicial consequences for someone once labelled as a batterer. This Article explores how collateral consequences, generally recognized only in criminal cases, now afflict those involved in civil domestic violence cases. It examines the civil domestic violence process and discusses why the process and its resulting orders create collateral consequences. The Article also identifies those collateral consequences unique to CPO cases and reveals why these consequences continue to impact […]

Read more

Scholarship round-up II – two new articles by Jack Chin

CCRC board member Jack Chin, Professor of Law at U.C. Davis, has recently posted two important articles about collateral consequences.  One is a general overview of various recent proposals to reform the way collateral consequences are treated in the justice system, which will be published as part of a report on scholarship on criminal justice reform edited by Professor Eric Luna. The other argues that under the Grand Jury Clause of the Constitution certain federal misdemeanors may only be prosecuted by indictment because of the severe collateral consequences they carry.   Chin and his co-author John Ormonde propose that “[m]ore thoughtful evaluation of misdemeanor cases before charge would often terminate cases which wind up being dismissed after charge,” thereby sparing less serious offenders from the stigma of a criminal record.  Because federal law makes no provision for sealing or expunging nonconviction records, even dismissed charges will appear on a rap sheet.

Read more

Collateral consequences scholarship round-up

Collateral consequences and restoration of rights have become hot topics in academia as the consequences of conviction grow more severe and the need for law reform becomes more apparent.  Below we survey notable articles on topics relating to collateral consequences that have been released so far in 2017, some of which will be covered in more detail in subsequent posts.  We hope to make scholarship round-ups a regular feature on the CCRC site, and we welcome submissions on relevant topics.  A more complete collection of scholarship on issues relating to collateral consequences can be found on our “Books & Articles” page.   “Briefing the Supreme Court: Promoting Science or Myth?” Melissa Hamilton, University of Houston Law Center Emory Law Journal Online (Forthcoming) Date Posted on SSRN: March 23, 2017 The United States Supreme Court is considering Packingham v. North Carolina, a case testing the constitutionality of a ban on the use of social networking sites by registered sex offenders. An issue that has arisen in the case is the state’s justification for the ban. North Carolina and thirteen other states represented in a friend of the court brief make three claims concerning the risk of registered sex offenders: (1) sex offenders have a notoriously high rate […]

Read more