Tag: marijuana

Marijuana expungement accelerates in 2020

*NEW: Marijuana legalization and expungement in early 2021 Marijuana expungement reforms continued to accelerate last year, and record relief has now attained a more prominent role in the broader legalization movement. As we documented in our recent report on 2020 criminal record reforms, six states enacted specialized marijuana relief laws in 2020, following 7 states (and D.C.) that did so in 2019, and 4 states in 2018. This brings the total number of states with specialized marijuana expungement laws to 23. In Congress, the House passed the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act in November, which establishes a process to expunge convictions and conduct sentencing review hearings related to federal marijuana offenses. However, the Senate did not bring it up for consideration so it will have to be reintroduced in the new Congress. In 2020, Arizona and Montana approved ballot measures to authorize expungement for many marijuana offenses; Vermont made expungement automatic for marijuana possession of 2 ounces or less; Michigan and Utah streamlined marijuana record relief procedures; and Virginia restricted access to records of marijuana possession offenses. These laws are described in greater detail below. Arizona passed a marijuana legalization ballot measure that requires courts, upon petition, to expunge arrests, charges, and convictions for certain marijuana possession, consumption, transportation and cultivation offenses (effective July 2, 2021) (Prop. 207). Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2862. Michigan streamlined petitions for marijuana misdemeanors with a presumption in favor of set-aside and sealing for offenses that have been decriminalized (HB 4982); and provided for a rehearing or appeal where set-aside of a marijuana misdemeanor is denied (HB 5120). Montana passed a marijuana legalization ballot measure that provides that a person serving a sentence—or who has completed a sentence—for an act now legalized or now punishable by a lesser sentence may petition for an expungement, resentencing, and/or redesignation (I-190). I-190 sec. 36 (2020). Utah made eligibility periods and the requirement of a certificate of eligibility inapplicable to convictions for possession of marijuana for medicinal purposes (SB 121) Utah Code Ann. § 77-40-103(5). Vermont authorized automatic expungement of convictions involving possession of 2 ounces or less of marijuana entered prior to January 1, 2021, with expungement to be completed no later than January 1, 2022 (S.234). Virginia decriminalized marijuana possession, restricted public access to records relating to past arrests, charges, or convictions for this offense, prohibited employers and educational institutions from inquiring about them, and prohibited state and local officials from requiring an applicant for a license, permit, registration, or governmental service to disclose information about them (SB 2 / HB 972). Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-250.1; 19.2-389.3. The full 2020 report is available here. Read more

Marijuana expungement accelerates across the country

In November’s election, four more states legalized marijuana at the ballot box: Arizona, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota. The measures in Arizona and Montana included provisions for expunging the record of convictions for certain marijuana arrests or convictions. During this year’s presidential campaign, President-elect Joseph R. Biden called for decriminalizing marijuana use and automatically expunging all marijuana use convictions. As legalization continues to advance, the expungement of criminal records has finally attained a prominent role in marijuana reform, a development we documented in March. Laws to facilitate marijuana expungement and other forms of record relief, such as sealing and set-aside, have now been enacted in 23 states and D.C. Until very recently, most such laws extended to very minor offenses involving small amounts of marijuana and required individuals to file petitions in court to obtain relief. Now, a growing number of states have authorized marijuana record relief that covers more offenses and either does away with petition requirements or streamlines procedures. With these developments, we have again updated our chart providing a 50-state snapshot of: (1) laws legalizing and decriminalizing marijuana; (2) laws that specifically provide relief for past marijuana arrests and convictions, including but not limited to conduct that has been legalized or decriminalized; and (3) pardon programs specific to marijuana offenses. As of this writing, 15 states and D.C. have legalized adult-use marijuana, and 16 additional states and one territory have decriminalized marijuana to some degree. Twenty-three states and D.C. have enacted expungement, sealing, or set-aside laws specifically for marijuana, or targeted more generally to decriminalized or legalized conduct (compared to 17 states and D.C. as of March 2020). Six states have developed specialized pardon programs for marijuana offenses (compared to 4 states as of March 2020) This comment describes some of the history of marijuana decriminalization, legalization, and expungement reforms, recent trends, and the current state of the law in this area. It provides strong evidence of what Professor Douglas A. Berman has described as the “linking and leveraging” of the marijuana reform and expungement movements. I. Developments in marijuana record relief Starting in the 1930s, Congress and many states criminalized marijuana (on the basis of openly racist rhetoric and against the recommendations of the American Medical Association), increasing the penalties over time. Forty years later, the tide slowly began to turn. Between 1973 and 1978, close to a dozen states decriminalized offenses involving small amounts of marijuana, making the maximum penalty a fine. After a two-decade hiatus roughly covering the height of the so-called War on Crime, beginning in 2001 more than a dozen additional states followed suit. Some of these new decriminalization laws authorized people to petition the courts to expunge convictions for conduct that was no longer punishable by incarceration. Contemporaneously, states were enacting medical marijuana laws, and at least 36 states and four territories now have such laws. Legalization of recreational use and sales of marijuana began in 2012 and 2014, although the first four states to legalize showed little interest in facilitating the expungement of past marijuana arrests and convictions. (I argue in a law review note that legalization campaigns using messages of “white individualism” implicitly reinforced marijuana prohibition’s racist legacy and tended to correlate with a lack of interest in policies such as expungement.) It was not until 2016 that one legalization state, California, began significant efforts to deliver relief for individuals with marijuana records. California’s 2016 ballot measure included important provisions authorizing courts to seal records, reduce offense levels, and re-sentence people in jails and prisons, upon request. A number of local district attorneys began to proactively secure relief on people’s behalf. Professor Berman, encouraged by these developments in California and other efforts by marijuana reformers to push for removal or reduction of past convictions, called in an early 2018 article for greater “linking and leveraging” of the marijuana reform and expungement movements. Professor Berman’s call seems to have been heard. In 2018, four states (CA, DE, MA, RI) authorized record relief specific to marijuana offenses, as part of a set of 29 bills authorizing criminal record relief more generally. California’s law was most notable, providing systematic procedures at the state and county level to seal and reduce marijuana arrests and convictions without requiring individuals to file applications. Pennsylvania, with the enactment of its groundbreaking Clean Slate Act of 2018, jump-started a trend toward automating record relief for a range of non-conviction and conviction records more broadly. In 2019, as part of broader set of 67 bills creating, expanding, or streamlining criminal record relief, eight states authorized record relief specific to marijuana offenses (DE, HI, IL, NH, NJ, NY, OR, WA), with automatic processes authorized in Illinois, New Jersey, and New York. Following Pennsylvania’s lead from the previous year, Utah, California, and New Jersey enacted important generally applicable “clean slate” automatic relief measures; with Michigan following suit in 2020. So far this year, another six states (AZ, MI, MT, SD, VT, VA) have enacted marijuana-specific expungement or sealing laws including automatic relief measures in Vermont and Virginia. In the Democratic presidential primary, many candidates called for broad-based expungement of marijuana records. President-elect Biden promised to “decriminalize cannabis use and automatically expunge prior convictions.” While the president lacks authority single-handedly to expunge even federal convictions, he indisputably has the ability to encourage action from Congress—which is now considering a bill to end federal marijuana criminalization and expunge records—and from the States. II. A national look at marijuana expungement laws Our 50-state tool aims to help individuals with records, policymakers, advocates, journalists, and scholars understand the rapid changes in marijuana expungement law, and to encourage further efforts to expand relief. Let’s dig into the twenty-three states and D.C. that have enacted expungement, sealing, or set-aside laws specifically for marijuana, decriminalized, or legalized offenses. Ten states and D.C. authorize people to submit petitions to expunge convictions involving small amounts of marijuana. Five states authorize petitions for a wider range of offenses often with simplified procedures. Six states have gone much further to provide automated relief, and in some cases expanding eligibility criteria to a broad range of offenses. These laws are discussed further below, and in more detail on our chart, which also provides citations. Six states have laws that direct the government to provide for automatic relief, and authorize petition-based relief, for a range of marijuana offenses (CA, IL, NY, NJ, VT, VA): CA: Prob. 64 (2016) authorized individuals who had completed a sentence for a wide range of marijuana offenses to petition the court to have the conviction either dismissed and sealed, resentenced, and/or redesignated, depending on the offense. AB 1793 (2018) replaced the requirement of individualized filings with an authority for systematic relief for eligible cases (unless the prosecutor objects), to be completed by July 1, 2020. Records of arrest and conviction for possession or transportation of small amounts of marijuana, adult or juvenile, “shall not be kept beyond two years from the date of the conviction or from the date of the arrest if there was no conviction…” Most marijuana offenses by individuals under 18 are destroyed when the person reaches 18. IL: In 2019, Illinois authorized automatic expungement of “minor cannabis offenses” (defined as involving possession of not more than 30 grams, no enhancements and no violence) in two phases: the state police were directed to identify eligible arrests and convictions and 1) to take steps themselves to expunge arrests not resulting in conviction; and 2) to send eligible convictions to the governor through the Prisoner Review Board for a pardon authorizing expungement. In December 2019, Governor Pritzker issued pardons to 11,017 people with eligible convictions. The same law also authorized courts to expunge misdemeanors and Level 4 felonies involving a greater amount of marijuana, on petition by the affected individual or the State’s Attorney, subject to a balancing test. NJ: While efforts to decriminalize and legalize marijuana failed in 2019, a bill was enacted that expanded expungement eligibility to a broad range of marijuana and hashish convictions (along with other classes of offenses), directed the development of an automatic “sealing” system for such convictions where all terms of the sentence have been completed (including payment of any financial assessment), and in the interim authorized courts upon petition to seal records immediately upon completion of sentence.  Legalization passed at the ballot in 2020. NY: SB 6579 (2019) provided for automatic vacatur and expungement of convictions for offenses for possession of two ounces or less of marijuana, to be completed by August 27, 2020. The expunged record is only available to the subject of the record and may be destroyed upon written request. The law provides for an information campaign to inform the public of automatic marijuana vacatur and expungement. VT: On October 7, 2020, the governor signed S.234, authorizing automatic expungement of convictions involving possession of 2 ounces or less of marijuana entered prior to January 1, 2021, said expungement program to be completed no later than January 1, 2022. In addition, a person who “was convicted of an offense for which the underlying conduct is no longer prohibited by law or designated as a criminal offense” may petition for expungement immediately upon completion of sentence, including satisfaction of any restitution. Expungement “shall” be ordered “unless the court finds that expungement would not be in the interest of justice.” VA: Per a 2020 law, public access to records of decriminalized marijuana possession convictions in the central repository is automatically limited and employers and educational institutions are prohibited from inquiring about them. Five states authorize petitions to expunge, set-aside, vacate, or reduce a broader set of marijuana offenses often with streamlined procedures (AZ, OR, MI, MT, WA): AZ: Effective July 2, 2021, courts must, upon petition, expunge arrests, charges, and convictions for certain possession, consumption, transportation and cultivation offenses. OR: Persons with convictions for possession, delivery, or manufacture of marijuana may file a motion to set aside the conviction after one year, if the defendant was under 21 at the time of conviction, has not been convicted of another offense (excluding traffic violations), and has fully complied with and performed the sentence. For purposes of eligibility for set aside, marijuana offenses committed before April 21, 2017, are classified as if the conduct occurred after that date, and decriminalized offenses are treated as class C misdemeanors. Persons with convictions committed before July 1, 2015 for marijuana possession of less than 1 ounce, who have fully served the sentence, may apply for set-aside without paying any fee, file fingerprints, or complete a background check or identification. A person may file a motion to reduce the offense classification of a marijuana conviction if, since the conviction, the offense has been reduced and the person has fully served the sentence; no fee may be charged. The Oregon Circuit Courts have set up an online filing system for marijuana set-asides and reductions. MI: In October 2020, a streamlined process for setting aside marijuana misdemeanors was enacted, effective immediately. HB4982 streamlines petitions for marijuana misdemeanors with a presumption in favor of set-aside for offenses that have been decriminalized. HB5120 provides for a rehearing or appeal where set-aside of a marijuana misdemeanor is denied. MT: Effective Jan. 1, 2021, a person serving a sentence—or who has completed a sentence—for an act now legalized or now punishable by a lesser sentence may petition for an expungement, resentencing, and/or redesignation. WA: Any person convicted of a misdemeanor marijuana offense, who was 21 years or older at the time of the offense, may immediately apply to the sentencing court to vacate the conviction, and if the person is eligible the court “shall” do so. Ten states and D.C. have authorized record relief in cases where the offense conduct has since been decriminalized or legalized (CO, CT, DC, DE, HI, MD, MA, MN, NV, NH, RI): CO: Upon petition, courts must seal the records of misdemeanor marijuana possession or use offenses that would not have been crimes if committed on or after December 10, 2012. Anyone convicted or charged with underage possession or consumption of marijuana may apply for sealing. CT: Upon petition, courts must order destruction of convictions and other criminal records in cases where the charges resulting in conviction have been decriminalized. DC: Persons with conviction and non-conviction records for decriminalized and legalized offenses may file motions to seal the records (a motion “shall” be granted unless there were other associated charges or convictions, in which case it “may” be granted “in the interests of justice”). DE: Any person convicted of a single offense for possession, use, or consumption of marijuana under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11 § 4373, prior to December 18, 2015, is eligible to petition the state police for mandatory expungement (provided the other requirements for mandatory expungement are met). Any person convicted of a single offense for possession, use, or consumption of 1 ounce or less of marijuana, who was under the age of 21 at the time of the offense, may upon reaching the age of 21 apply to the court for expungement. HI: Upon motion, a court “must” grant expungement of a conviction for possession of three grams or less of marijuana, if no other charges were brought. MD: A person may petition for expungement of a conviction if “the act on which the conviction was based is no longer a crime.” A person may also petition for expungement of any conviction for marijuana possession four years after satisfactory completion of sentence, including probation. MA: Upon request, records of conviction for an offense “which is no longer a crime” may be sealed immediately, “except in cases where the elements of the offense continue to be a crime under a different designation.” MN: A person who, prior to April 11, 1976, was convicted of misdemeanor possession—or sale without remuneration—of 42.5 g or less of marijuana, and the conviction would be a petty misdemeanor as of April 11, 1978, may petition for expungement. NV: A person convicted of an offense that is “no longer punishable as a crime” (except traffic offenses) may submit a request to the court to seal the record, which “shall” be granted unless there is an objection from the prosecutor, with a showing of good cause by clear and convincing evidence why the request should not be granted. No filing fee may be charged. NH: A person who was arrested or convicted before September 16, 2017 for obtaining, purchasing, transporting, or possessing 3/4 ounce of marijuana or less, may at any time petition the court to “annul” (seal) the arrest and court record. RI: A person may immediately file a motion for the expungement of records “related to an offense that has been decriminalized subsequent to the date of their conviction.” The court must hold a hearing, and if it finds that all conditions of the sentence have been completed, including the payment of fines and fees, the court shall order expungement without cost to the person. In addition, North Dakota authorizes sealing for “first offender” marijuana possession; and Utah streamlined the process for expunging convictions for possession of cannabis used for medicinal purposes by bypassing the requirement to apply for a certificate of eligibility. Beyond marijuana- and decriminalization-focused expungement laws, many states have general record relief laws that may apply to marijuana offenses among other offenses. III. Specialized pardon programs for marijuana convictions Six states have established pardon programs specific to marijuana offenses (CO, IL, ND, NV, PA, WA): CO: Per a 2020 bill, the governor may pardon a class of defendants convicted of possession of up to two ounces of marijuana. On Oct 1, 2020, Gov. Polis pardoned 2,732 people with marijuana possession convictions. IL: As discussed above, Illinois authorized automatic expungement of “minor cannabis offenses” which includes sending eligible convictions to the governor through the Prisoner Review Board for a pardon authorizing expungement.  In December 2019, Governor Pritzker issued pardons to 11,017 people with eligible convictions. ND: A Pardon Advisory Board policy adopted in 2019 authorizes people convicted of marijuana possession who have had no convictions in the past five years to “submit a Summary Pardon Application” (form, July 2019). In Jan. 2020, Governor Burgum pardoned 16 people under this authority (of 26 recommended by the board). As of Feb. 2020, the board was seeking more applicants. The Office of the Governor estimates that as many as 175,000 people may be eligible for relief. NV: In June 2020, the Nevada State Board of Pardons Commissioners passed a resolution to summarily pardon those convicted of possession of one ounce or less of marijuana. See FAQs. However, the Board was unable to identify the records of this offense for: 1) people charged prior to 2001, when this offense was a felony; 2) people charged with this offense who pled to other offenses. Nonetheless, these convictions can still be pardoned upon application. PA: The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons has established an expedited review program for certain non-violent marijuana convictions. WA: Gov. Inslee has pardoned a number of people convicted of marijuana possession offenses no longer criminal under state law, pursuant to his Marijuana Justice Initiative (eligibility: sole conviction for adult (21+) misdemeanor marijuana possession, between Jan. 1, 1998-Dec. 5, 2012, prosecuted under WA state law). The full 50-state chart is available here. Read more

Legalizing marijuana and expunging records across the country

*NEW: Marijuana legalization and expungement in early 2021 As the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana has now reached a majority of the states, the expungement of criminal records has finally attained a prominent role in the marijuana reform agenda.  Laws to facilitate marijuana expungement and other forms of record relief, such as sealing and set-aside, have now been enacted in more than a dozen states.  Most of these laws cover only very minor offenses involving small amounts of marijuana, and require individuals to file petitions in court to obtain relief.  But a handful of states have authorized streamlined record reforms that will do away with petition requirements and cover more offenses.  In the 2020 presidential race, Democratic candidates have called for wide-ranging and automatic relief for marijuana records. Given these important developments that we expect will continue in the present legislative season, we have put together a chart providing a 50-state snapshot of: (1) laws legalizing and decriminalizing marijuana; (2) laws that specifically provide relief for past marijuana arrests and convictions, including but not limited to conduct that has been legalized or decriminalized; and (3) pardon programs specific to marijuana offenses. We hope this tool will help people assess the current state of marijuana reform and work to develop more expansive, accessible, and effective record relief. As of this writing, 26 states, D.C., and one territory have legalized or decriminalized marijuana to some degree.  Eleven states and D.C. have done both.  Seventeen states and D.C. have enacted expungement, sealing, or set-aside laws specifically for marijuana, or targeted more generally to decriminalized or legalized conduct.  Four states have pardon programs for marijuana offenses.  Our 50-state chart documenting these laws is available here.  We will update this chart to cover new legislative developments as they occur.  For example, just this week both chambers of the Virginia legislature passed a bill that would decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana and limit access to records of such offenses. This comment describes some of the history of marijuana decriminalization, legalization, and expungement reforms, recent trends, and the current state of the law in this area.  It attempts to provide evidence for what Professor Douglas A. Berman recently described as the “linking and leveraging” of the marijuana reform and expungement movements. I.  Recent developments in marijuana record relief Starting in the 1930s, Congress and many states criminalized marijuana (on the basis of openly racist rhetoric), and increased the penalties over time.  Forty years later, the tide slowly began to reverse.  Between 1973 and 1978, close to a dozen states decriminalized offenses involving small amounts of marijuana, making the maximum penalty a fine.  After a two-decade hiatus roughly covering the height of the so-called War on Crime, beginning in 2001, more than a dozen additional states followed suit.  Some of these new decriminalization laws authorized people to petition the courts to expunge convictions for conduct that is no longer punishable by incarceration.  Contemporaneously, states were enacting medical marijuana laws, and at least 33 states and D.C. now have such laws. Legalization of recreational use and sales of marijuana began in 2012 and 2014, although the first four states to legalize showed little interest in facilitating the expungement of past marijuana arrests and convictions.  (I argue in a law review note that “white individualism” in these legalization campaigns implicitly reinforced marijuana prohibition’s racist legacy and tended to correlate with a lack of interest in policies such as expungement.)  It was not until 2016 that one legalization state, California, began significant efforts to deliver relief for individuals with marijuana records.  California’s 2016 ballot measure included important provisions authorizing courts to seal records, reduce offense levels, and re-sentence people in jails and prisons, upon request.  A number of local district attorneys began to proactively secure relief on people’s behalf. Professor Berman, encouraged by these developments in California and other efforts by marijuana reformers to push for removal or reduction of past convictions, called in an early 2018 article for greater “linking and leveraging” of the marijuana reform and expungement movements. Professor Berman’s call seems to have been heard.  In 2018, four states (CA, DE, MA, RI) authorized record relief specific to marijuana offenses, as part of a set of 29 bills authorizing criminal record relief more generally.  California’s law was most notable, providing systematic procedures at the state and county level to seal and reduce marijuana arrests and convictions without requiring individuals to file applications.  Pennsylvania, with the enactment of its groundbreaking Clean Slate Act of 2018, jump-started a trend toward automating record relief for a range of non-conviction and conviction records more broadly. In 2019, as part of broader set of 67 bills creating, expanding, or streamlining criminal record relief, eight states authorized record relief specific to marijuana offenses (DE, HI, IL, NH, NJ, NY, OR, WA), with automatic processes authorized in Illinois, New Jersey, and New York.  Following Pennsylvania’s lead from the previous year, Utah, California, and New Jersey enacted important generally applicable “clean slate” automatic relief measures.  In the 2020 Democratic presidential primary, many candidates have called for broad-based expungement of marijuana records, including the two leading candidates still in the race.  Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign website states that he will legalize marijuana through executive action and “[v]acate and expunge all past marijuana-related convictions.”  (It bears noting that the president lacks authority single-handedly to vacate and expunge even federal convictions, though he indisputably has the ability to encourage Congress and the states to act.)  Similarly, former Vice President Joe Biden promises as president to “decriminalize cannabis use and automatically expunge prior convictions.”  (Same comment.) II.  A national look at marijuana expungement laws Our 50-state tool aims to help individuals with records, policymakers, advocates, journalists, and scholars understand the rapid changes in marijuana expungement law, and to encourage further efforts to expand relief.  The chart is adapted with permission from Alana Rosen’s “High Time for Criminal Justice Reform” with updates to reflect legislative changes in the past 18 months. Let’s dig into the seventeen states and D.C. that have enacted expungement, sealing, or set-aside laws specifically for marijuana, decriminalized, or legalized offenses.  Most of these jurisdictions (12 of 18) authorize people to submit petitions to expunge convictions involving small amounts of marijuana.  Two states authorize petitions for a wider range of offenses with simplified procedures.  Recently, four states have gone much further, expanding eligibility criteria to a broader range of offenses and streamlining procedures to provide automated relief.  These laws are discussed further below, and in more detail on our chart. Four states have laws that direct the government to provide for automatic relief, and authorize petition-based relief, for a wide range of marijuana offenses (CA, IL, NY, NJ): CA: Prob. 64 (2016) authorized individuals who had completed a sentence for a wide range of marijuana offenses to petition the court to either have the conviction dismissed and sealed, resentenced, and/or redesignated, depending on the offense.  AB 1793 (2018) replaced the requirement of individualized filings with an authority for systematic relief for eligible cases (unless the prosecutor objects), to be completed by July 1, 2020.  Records of arrest and conviction for possession or transportation of small amounts of marijuana, adult or juvenile, “shall not be kept beyond two years from the date of the conviction or from the date of the arrest if there was no conviction…”  Most marijuana offenses by individuals under 18 are destroyed when the person reaches 18. IL: In 2019, Illinois authorized automatic expungement of “minor cannabis offenses” (defined as involving possession of not more than 30 grams, no enhancements and no violence) in two phases:  the state police were directed to identify eligible arrests and convictions and 1) to take steps themselves to expunge arrests not resulting in conviction; and 2) to send eligible convictions to the governor through the Prisoner Review Board for a pardon authorizing expungement.  In December 2019, Governor Pritzker issued pardons to 11,017 people with eligible convictions.  The law also authorized courts to expunge misdemeanors and Level 4 felonies involving a greater amount of marijuana, on petition by the affected individual or the State’s Attorney, subject to a balancing test. NJ: While efforts to decriminalize and legalize marijuana failed in 2019, a bill was enacted that expanded expungement eligibility to a broad range of marijuana and hashish convictions (along with other classes of offenses), directed for the development of an automatic “sealing” system for such convictions where all terms of the sentence have been completed (including payment of any financial assessment), and authorized courts upon petition to seal records immediately upon completion of sentence. NY: SB 6579 (2019) provides for automatic vacatur and expungement of convictions for offenses for possession of two ounces or less of marijuana, to be completed by August 27, 2020.  The expunged record is only available to the subject of the record and is destroyed upon written request. The law provides for an information campaign to inform the public of automatic marijuana vacatur and expungement. Two states authorize petitions to set-aside, vacate, or reduce a broader set of marijuana offenses with streamlined procedures (OR, WA): OR: Persons with convictions for possession, delivery, or manufacture of marijuana may file a motion to set aside the conviction after one year, if the defendant was under 21 at the time of conviction, has not been convicted of another offense excluding traffic violations, and has fully complied with and performed the sentence.  For purposes of eligibility for set aside, marijuana offenses committed before April 21, 2017, are classified as if the conduct occurred after 21, 2017, and decriminalized offenses are treated as class C misdemeanors.  Persons with convictions committed before July 1, 2015 for marijuana possession of less than 1 ounce, who have fully served the sentence, may apply for set-aside without paying any fee, file fingerprints, or complete a background check or identification.  A person may file a motion to reduce the offense classification of a marijuana conviction if, since the conviction, the offense has been reduced and the person has fully served the sentence; no fee may be charged.  The Oregon Circuit Courts have set up an online filing system for marijuana set-asides and reductions. WA: Any person convicted of a misdemeanor marijuana offense, who was 21 years or older at the time of the offense, may immediately apply to the sentencing court to vacate the conviction, and if the person is eligible, the court “shall” do so. Eleven states and D.C. have authorized record relief in cases where the offense conduct has since been decriminalized or legalized (CO, CT, DC, DE, HI, MD, MA, MN, NV, NH, RI, VT): CO: Upon petition, courts must seal the records of misdemeanor marijuana possession or use offenses that would not have been crimes if committed on or after December 10, 2012.  Anyone convicted or charged with underage possession or consumption of marijuana may apply for sealing. CT: Upon petition, court must order destruction of convictions and other criminal records in cases where the charges resulting in conviction have been decriminalized. DC: Persons with conviction and non-conviction records for decriminalized and legalized offenses may file motions to seal the records (a motion “shall” be granted unless there were other associated charges or convictions, in which case it may be granted “in the interests of justice”). DE: Any person convicted of a single offense for possession, use, or consumption of marijuana under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11 § 4373, prior to December 18, 2015, is eligible to petition the state police for mandatory expungement (provided the other requirements for mandatory expungement are met).  Any person convicted of a single offense for possession, use, or consumption of 1 ounce or less of marijuana, who was under the age of 21 at the time of the offense, may upon reaching the age of 21 apply to the court for expungement.  HI: Upon motion, a court “must” grant expungement of a conviction for possession of three grams or less of marijuana, if no other charges were brought. MD: A person may petition for expungement of a conviction if “the act on which the conviction was based is no longer a crime.” A person may also petition for expungement of any conviction for marijuana possession four years after satisfactory completion of sentence, including probation. MA: Upon request, records of conviction for an offense “which is no longer a crime” may be sealed immediately, “except in cases where the elements of the offense continue to be a crime under a different designation.” MN: A person who was convicted of an offense prior the 1976 decriminalization of possession or sale without renumeration of 42.5 g or less of marijuana, and the conviction would now be a petty misdemeanor, may petition for expungement. NV: A person convicted of an offense that is “no longer punishable as a crime” (except traffic offenses) may submit a request to the court to seal the record, which “shall” be granted unless there is an objection from the prosecutor, with a showing of good cause by clear and convincing evidence why the request should not be granted.  No filing fee may be charged. NH: A person who was arrested or convicted before September 16, 2017 for obtaining, purchasing, transporting, or possessing 3/4 ounce of marijuana or less, may at any time petition the court to annul the arrest and court record. RI: A person may immediately file a motion for the expungement of records “related to an offense that has been decriminalized subsequent to the date of their conviction.”  The court must hold a hearing, and if it finds that all conditions of the sentence have been completed, included the payment of fines, fees, the court shall order the expungement without cost to the person. VT: A person who “was convicted of an offense for which the underlying conduct is no longer prohibited by law or designated as a criminal offense” may petition for expungement immediately upon completion of sentence, including satisfaction of any restitution.  Expungement “shall” be ordered “unless the court finds that expungement would not be in the interest of justice.” Beyond marijuana- and decriminalization-focused expungement laws, many states have general record relief laws that may apply to marijuana offenses among other offenses. In addition, four states have established pardon programs specific to marijuana offenses (IL, ND, PA, WA): IL: As discussed above, Illinois authorized automatic expungement of “minor cannabis offenses” which includes sending eligible convictions to the governor through the Prisoner Review Board for a pardon authorizing expungement.  In December 2019, Governor Pritzker issued pardons to 11,017 people with eligible convictions. ND: A Pardon Advisory Board policy adopted in 2019 authorizes people convicted of marijuana possession who have had no convictions in the past five years to “submit a Summary Pardon Application” (form, July 2019). In Jan. 2020, the governor pardoned 16 people under this authority (of 26 recommended by the board). As of Feb. 2020, the board was seeking more applicants. The Office of the Governor estimates that as many as 175,000 people may be eligible for relief. PA: The Pennsylvania Board of Pardons has established an expedited review program for certain non-violent marijuana convictions. WA: Gov. Inslee has pardoned a number of people convicted of marijuana possession offenses no longer criminal under state law, pursuant to his Marijuana Justice Initiative (eligibility: sole conviction for adult (21+) misdemeanor marijuana possession, between Jan. 1, 1998-Dec. 5, 2012, prosecuted under WA state law). The full 50-state chart is available here. Read more

Legislative update: third quarter 2019 sees more new licensing and expungement laws

In July we reported on the extraordinary number of new laws enacted in the first half of 2019 aimed at restoring rights and status after arrest and conviction.  A total of 97 separate pieces of legislation, some covering multiple topics, were enacted by 38 states and many broke new ground in their jurisdictions.  Moreover, clear trends begun in 2018 accelerated in the first half of 2019, as state lawmakers continued to focus most of their attention on facilitating access to record-clearing.  In addition, a significant number of new laws limited the authority of occupational licensing boards to disqualify a person based on criminal record.  Another area of progress was restoring voting rights. Those trends continued over the summer, with 17 new laws, including significant laws enacted to regulate occupational licensing and expand record relief, including but not limited to marijuana convictions.  Several states showed a keen interest in exploring the possibility of automating record relief, although only one state actually enacted an automatic relief system by the end of the quarter (New York, for marijuana convictions).  (California enacted a “clean slate” law shortly after the beginning of the fourth quarter.)  At the end of the third quarter, Arkansas, Colorado and Florida were studying the feasibility of automating relief, North Carolina was considering automatic expunction of non-conviction records, and the Governor of New Jersey was attempting to persuade his legislature to adopt an automated system for convictions as well as non-convictions.) By the end of the third quarter of 2019, 42 states had enacted an unprecedented total of 114 laws restoring rights and status, and more new laws on the horizon. All of the laws described briefly below are more fully analyzed in the context of the state’s overall restoration scheme, in the detailed profiles of the Restoration of Rights Project. Occupational licensing Florida and North Carolina enacted impressive occupational licensing schemes.  Florida’s new licensing provisions added by H7125 appear targeted to trades learned in the state prison system, and also provide that: “A conviction, or any other adjudication, for a crime more than 5 years before the date the application is received by the applicable board may not be grounds for denial of a [specified] license.”  Boards are permitted to consider violent and sexual offenses but only if they “relate to the practice of the profession.”  Starting on October 1, 2019, and updated quarterly thereafter, the boards must compile a list identifying each crime used as a basis for a license denial. North Carolina’s new law prohibits disqualification from licensure unless a crime is “directly related” to the license involved, requires written reasons in the event of denial, and provides for a preliminary determination as to whether an individual will be favorably considered that is binding on the board when the applicant later applies.  The new law also requires licensing boards to report annually to the legislature on their consideration of applications from people with a criminal record. In New Hampshire, HB 637 created two categories of criminal history information to be maintained by the state police records repository, one “confidential” and the other “public.”  “Confidential criminal history information” (defined to include non-conviction records and records of convictions that have been annulled) will no longer be disseminated for employment and licensing purposes.    Sealing and expungement Florida substantially reorganized its laws relating to sealing and expungement of non-conviction records in H7125, and the Department of Law Enforcement was directed to create an automatic process for sealing eligible non-conviction records.  See Fla. Stat. § 943.0595. Four states (DE, HI, NH and NY) passed laws authorizing expungement or sealing of marijuana possession convictions.  Of these new laws, New York’s law setting up an automated relief system is by far the most significant, because it seals the record without requiring eligible individuals to apply to the court for relief.  Individuals whose records are sealed may, further, apply later to have the record destroyed.  As an important recent study by JJ Prescott and Sonja Starr established, where laws make relief depend upon a burdensome petition process, few eligible individuals will take advantage of them.  (As the third quarter ended, a far broader “clean slate” bill was poised for enactment in California, and was signed on October 7.) Relatedly, in August, New Jersey’s governor Phil Murphy refused to sign a bill substantially expanding expungement in that state, which included but was not limited to marijuana convictions, on grounds that its cumbersome petition process did not go far enough in addressing the problem of dated convictions.  The governor cited with approval the “clean slate” law enacted by New Jersey’s neighboring state Pennsylvania, and proposed a series of measures aimed at developing a similar automated system in his state.  As of this writing, the governor has been unable to persuade the legislature to adopt it, but we may expect to see another pass at the problem before year’s end. Two more states (HI and NC) expanded their provisions offering record relief to victims of human trafficking convicted of any non-violent offense linked to their victim status. Civil rights Finally, New Hampshire revised its law disqualifying people with a conviction from holding public office, making the restriction applicable only during actual incarceration, so that it is now coincident with the period of felony disenfranchisement (this limit on disenfranchisement to only during actual incarceration has been in place in the Granite State since 1965). Perhaps more significant, HB 486 requires the commissioner of the department of corrections to ensure that probation/parole officers receive instruction on the current state of the law regarding the civil rights of individuals convicted of a felony, and to direct that individuals serving a suspended sentence or on parole receive “written notice that he or she may vote during the period of the suspension or parole.” Similar provisions were enacted earlier in the year in Colorado and Washington.  In our experience, many people who have been convicted of a felony believe that they cannot vote long after their rights have been restored – and some (like those in New Hampshire not sentenced to prison) never lost the right to vote in the first place.     Read more

Marijuana decriminalization drives expungement reform

The national trend toward expanding opportunities for restoration of rights after conviction has continued to accelerate throughout 2018.  By our count, so far this year alone 31 states have broadened existing second chance laws or enacted entirely new ones, enhancing the prospects for successful reentry and reintegration for many thousands of Americans.  On November 6, Florida could take the most politically momentous step of the year if its voters approve a ballot initiative amending the state constitution to re-enfranchise more than a million and a half individuals who are now permanently barred from voting because of a past felony conviction.  We expect to publish a full report on these 2018 reforms, similar to the report we published last winter on 2017 laws, by the end of the year.  Expect it to feature the broad occupational licensing reforms enacted in more than a dozen states since last spring. Another important series of second chance reforms this year has accompanied marijuana decriminalization.  These reforms are documented and analyzed by Professor Douglas Berman in an important new paper titled “Leveraging Marijuana Reform to Enhance Expungement Practices.”  Published in a symposium issue of the Federal Sentencing Reporter devoted to various aspects of collateral consequences and criminal records management, Professor Berman’s paper showcases issues that will becomes increasingly important as the War on Drugs winds down.  Professor Berman is the executive director of Ohio State University’s Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, whose official launch is November 2.  We expect that the Center under his management will give restoration of rights an important place on its policy agenda. The abstract of Professor Berman’s article follows:  Leveraging Marijuana Reform to Enhance Expungement Practices States reforming marijuana laws should be particularly concerned with remedying the past inequities and burdens of mass criminalization.  State marijuana reforms should not only offer robust retroactive ameliorative relief opportunities for prior marijuana offenses, but also dedicate resources generated by marijuana reform to create and fund new institutions to assess and serve the needs of a broad array of offenders looking to remedy the collateral consequences of prior involvement in the criminal justice system.  So far, California stands out among reform states for coupling repeal of marijuana prohibition with robust efforts to enable and ensure the erasure of past marijuana convictions.  In addition to encouraging marijuana reform states to follow California’s lead in enacting broad ameliorative legislation, this essay urges policy makers and reform advocates to see the value of linking and leveraging the commitments and spirit of modern marijuana reform and expungement movements. Part II begins with a brief review of the history of marijuana prohibition giving particular attention to social and racial dynamics integral to prohibition, its enforcement and now its reform.   Part III turns to recent reform activities focused on mitigating the punitive collateral consequences of a criminal conviction with a focus on the (mostly limited) efforts of marijuana reform states to foster the erasure of marijuana convictions.  Part IV sketches a novel proposal for connecting modern marijuana reform and expungement movements.  This part suggest a new criminal justice institution, a Commission on Justice Restoration, to be funded by the taxes, fees and other revenues generated by marijuana reforms and to be tasked with proactively working on policies and practices designed to minimize and ameliorate undue collateral consequences for people with criminal convictions.      Read more