In the June 2 issue of the New York Law Journal, Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert argue that “criminal law concepts designed to punish human beings—bad boys and girls—are ill-suited to corporate beings.” They point out that corporations convicted of crime are rarely required to live with the kind of collateral consequences that result in loss of livelihood and social stigma for individuals (“Convicted Corporations Aren’t Really Bad Boys“). They describe how the government recently made “significant efforts to blunt the effects” of conviction on four major international banks that pleaded guilty to manipulation of foreign exchange rates, so that none of them ended up subject to “rules that would have restricted [their] ability to continue doing business in the United States.” The banks are currently seeking a waiver of Labor Department rules that would otherwise bar them from dealing with pension and retirement plans, and the government has postponed sentencing pending the outcome of these efforts. Read more
Tag: banks
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Restoration of Rights Project (RRP)
Restoration of Firearm Rights After Conviction: A National Survey and Recommendations for Reform (Dec. 2025)

50-state comparisons
About the Restoration of Rights Project
The Restoration of Rights Project (RRP) is a free online resource of the Collateral Consequences Resource Center (CCRC) that analyzes the law and practice in each U.S. jurisdiction relating to restoration of rights and status following arrest or conviction. Jurisdictional “profiles” cover areas such as loss and restoration of civil rights, including voting and firearm rights; judicial and executive mechanisms for avoiding or mitigating collateral consequences, including expungement and pardon; and, provisions addressing non-discrimination in employment, occupational licensing, and housing. Links to relevant legislative sites and other original sources are included. The profiles and other RRP resources are regularly updated in real time as new laws are enacted and policies changed.
Originally published in 2006 by CCRC Executive Director Margaret Love, the resources that comprise the RRP were re-organized in 2017 into a unified online platform that makes them easier to access, use, and understand. Over the years, the profiles and comparison charts have been expanded to broaden their scope and to account for the many changes in this complex area of the law. The short “postcard” summaries of the law in each state — which serve as a gateway to more detailed information — have been reviewed and revised to provide a more current and accurate snapshot of applicable law in each state. In addition to the jurisdictional profiles and postcards, RRP materials now include a set of 50-state comparison charts that make it possible to see national patterns in restoration laws and policies.
These reference materials are intended as a resource for practitioners in all phases of the criminal justice system, for courts, for civil practitioners assisting clients whose court-imposed sentence has exposed them to additional civil penalties, for policymakers and advocates interested in reentry and reintegration of convicted persons, and for the millions of Americans with a criminal record who are seeking to put their past behind them.
These resources are protected by copyright, but they may be republished as long as appropriate attribution is given to CCRC’s Restoration of Rights Project.




