Utah
Restoration of Rights & Record Relief

Last updated: November 6, 2024

I.  Loss & restoration of civil/firearms rights

A.  Vote and office 

Under the Utah Constitution, “any person convicted of a felony, or any person convicted of treason or a crime against the elective franchise, may not be permitted to vote at any election or be eligible to hold office in this State until the right to vote or hold elective office is restored as provided by statute.”  Utah Constit. Art. IV, § 6. 

  1. Vote 

Persons convicted of a felony, or a misdemeanor violation of the election code, lose the right to vote in Utah.  See Utah Code § 20A-2-101(2)(b).  The right to vote is restored automatically upon (1) a sentence to probation by the sentencing court; or (2) upon being granted parole by the Board of Pardons; or 3) successful completion of a term of incarceration.  §§ 20A-2-101.3(2); 20A-2-101.5(2). This applies to federal and out-of-state felony convictions. § 20A-2-101.5(1). Therefore, as a practical matter, anyone not in prison may vote in Utah.1 

2. Office  

Under Utah Code § 20A-2-101.5(3), the right to hold elective office lost under the state constitution is restored to a person convicted of a felony when

“(a) all of the felon’s felony convictions have been expunged; or

(b) (i) ten years have passed since the date of the felon’s most recent felony conviction; (ii) the felon has paid all court-ordered restitution and fines; and (iii) for each felony conviction that has not been expunged, the felon has (A) completed probation in relation to the felony; (B) been granted parole in relation to the felony; or (C) successfully completed incarceration associated with the felony.”

Similarly, under § 20A-2-101.3(3), a person convicted of an election law misdemeanor regains eligibility for office when: (a) the misdemeanor under the Election Code has been expunged; or (b)(i) five years have passed since the misdemeanant’s most recent misdemeanor conviction under the Election Code;(ii) the misdemeanant has paid all court-ordered restitution and fines; and (iii) for each misdemeanor conviction that has not been expunged, the misdemeanant has (A) completed probation in relation to the misdemeanor; (B) been granted parole in relation to the misdemeanor; or (C) successfully completed the term of incarceration associated with the misdemeanor.

B.  Jury eligibility

Persons convicted of a felony are ineligible to serve on a jury unless and until the conviction is expunged.  Utah Code Ann. § 78B-1-105(2).

C.  Firearms

Restrictions on firearms have been tightened in recent years.  Now no persons convicted of any felony may possess any firearm or other “dangerous weapon,” defined broadly.  Utah Code §§ 76-10-503(1) and (2).2  Persons convicted of “crime of violence” or on probation or parole, formerly the only category regulated, are subject to greater penalties.  Id.  Firearms restrictions may be removed by expungement (if eligible) or pardon. § 76-10-503(1)(c).  

II.  Pardon policy & practice

A.  Authority

Pardon authority is vested in the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Utah Const. art. VII, § 12; Utah Code § 77-27-5(4). (The governor may grant respites or reprieves in all cases of convictions for offenses against the state except treason or conviction on impeachment, but these respites or reprieves may not extend beyond the next session of the board. Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-5(4)). The Board is composed of five full-time salaried members, and up to five pro tem members who fill in and are paid on a per diem basis, all appointed by the governor with the consent of the Utah senate to five-year terms. Utah Code § 77-27-2.3

B.  Eligibility

Only people with state offenses are eligible. Utah Code § 77-27-5(1)(a). The Board only considers those whose sentences have been expired for five years, but may dispense with this requirement if good cause exists. Utah Admin. Code R671-315-1 (2)(b)(A), (D). The Board website states that “Pardon Applications are considered only after a significant period of time of exemplary citizenship and demonstrable evidence of rehabilitation and generally require that at least five (5) years have passed since the termination or expiration of all criminal offenses, sentences, and supervision on probation or parole. . . . The Board generally requires that all restitution, fines, and fees be paid for any conviction for which a pardon is sought.” 

In addition, by law the Utah board may consider an application only after an individual who is eligible for expungement has been denied that relief. See Utah Admin. Code R671-315-1 (2)(a):  “The Board may consider an application for a pardon . . . after the applicant has exhausted all judicial remedies, including expungement, in an effort to ameliorate the effects of the conviction.” The Board’s website states:

Utah law provides for a process known as Expungement, whereby some arrests and convictions can be expunged or purged from your criminal history.  (See Utah Code Ann. §77-40-101).  Before you apply for a pardon, the Board expects that you will seek an Expungement from the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification and the Courts.  As part of the pardon application, you will be required to detail your attempts to expunge the crimes for which you are seeking a pardon.

In recent years the caseload of the Pardon Board has increased because people with relatively minor offenses were being rejected for expungement by the Board of Criminal Investigation.  See section E below.

C.  Effect

Pardon restores all rights, and relieves legal disabilities. See Utah Code § 77-27-1(142) (defining “pardon” as “an act of grace that forgives a criminal conviction and restores the rights and privileges forfeited by or because of the criminal conviction by an appropriate authority exempting a person from punishment for a crime”). The Board generally specifies whether a pardon restores firearms rights. See § 77-27-5(1)(a).

As of 2013, a pardon also results in expungement. “Upon granting a pardon, the board shall issue an expungement order, directing any criminal justice agency to remove the recipient’s identifying information relating to the expunged convictions from its records.”  § 77-27-5.1(1).  A person pardoned prior to that date is entitled to expungement under the same authority.  Utah Code § 77-40a-303(9).  “An expungement order, issued by the board, has at least the same legal effect and authority as an order of expungement issued by a court, pursuant to Title 77.” § 77-27-5.1(2).  In 2017, § 77-27-5.1 was amended to provide that pardoned convictions do not count against expungement eligibility. See SB-12, § 2 (2017).  

D.  Process

Pardons can only be granted after a full hearing before the Board in open session.  Utah Constitution, Art. VII, §12.  See also Utah Code § 77-27-5(1)(a), (c) (e); Utah Admin. Code R671-304 (Hearing Record), R671-305-1 (Board Decisions and Orders). The application form and its instructions are found on the Board’s website.

The application process is onerous, and not every applicant is afforded a hearing.   As explained on the Board’s website, that

the Pardon Application will require you to obtain and submit police reports, court dockets, and pre-sentence investigation reports for all convictions for which a pardon is sought. If you are unable to obtain and submit this information, you will be required to explain and document all of your attempts to procure the requisite information, and the reasons it is unavailable.  Upon request from the Board, the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification may conduct a background investigation of the applicant. In all cases, applicants must include a current copy of their Utah criminal background report, obtained from BCI, as part of the Pardon Application.

The Board must give notice to the victim of the time and place of the hearing, “if the victim can be located.” Based on a law enacted in early 2019, timely prior notice of the time and location of the hearing shall be given to the petitioner and, whenever possible, the victim or the victim’s representative shall be notified of any hearing if the victim or representative has requested notification and provided current contact information to the board. See HB0301 (Mar. 22, 2019 (amending §77-27-5(2)(a) and (c). The county or city attorney’s office responsible for prosecution of the case; the sentencing court, and the presiding judge where conviction entered; and the chief law enforcement officials responsible for the defendant’s arrest and conviction, must also be notified of any board hearing through the board’s website. Id. (amending § 77-27-5(2)(b). See Utah Code § 77-27-5(1)(c); Utah Admin. Code R671- 315-1. 

Pardon decisions are made by majority. The Board may deny a pardon hearing. Utah Admin. Code § 671-315(6)C). The proceedings of the Board shall be recorded and filed as provided by statute, along with all papers used in the hearing. Id. R671-304-1. Utah Const. art VII, § 12 (2)(c). The decision of the Board is reduced to writing, including a rationale for the decision, and published. Utah Admin. Code § 671-305-1.

Pardon Application Instructions

A summary of the rules and procedures for pardon applications are available on the website of State of Utah: Board of Pardons and Paroles. There are helpful recommendations on the website of Rasa-Legal:

The first step to obtaining a pardon is to apply for an expungement and receive a denial letter from BCI. A link to the expungement application can be found here. If your income is 200% of the federal poverty line or below, Clean Slate Utah may be able to cover the cost of the $65 application. To see if you qualify for free assistance from Clean Slate Utah, visit their website or fill out the Clean Slate Utah intake form.

E.  Frequency of grants

Until recently, the possibility of regaining rights through judicial expungement has made the pardon process less important, with few applicants and fewer grants. Since 2013, the board’s pardon caseload has increased exponentially, largely because people with relatively minor offenses were being rejected for expungement by the Board of Criminal Investigation. (By law, the Utah board may consider an application only after an individual who is eligible for expungement has been denied that relief. For example, in 2014 54 people requested pardons, of which 24 were granted (25 were denied a hearing). See Report to the Utah Legislature: A Performance Audit of the Board of Pardons and Parole (2016). Chapter V of this report recommended that the Board should work with the BCI to review the expungement process and recommend changes that would “reduce pardon workloads.”  A subsequent performance audit in 2022 noted (at p. 63) that the Board was preparing annual reports on trends in pardon hearings, but those reports have not been made public.

F.  Contact

Mike Haddon
Director, Board of Pardons and Paroles
448 Winchester St., #300
Murray, UT 44107
(T): 801-261-6464
(F): 801-261-6481
bopinfo@utah.gov

III.  Expungement, sealing & other record relief

In 2010, the legislature significantly amended Utah’s laws on expungement.  See Utah Expungement Act of 2010, 2010 Utah Laws Ch. 283 (HB 21), codified at Utah Code § 77-40-101 (now recodified in 2022 in Title 77, Chapter 40a.) The 2010 law amended, inter alia, the types of crimes eligible for expungement, the period of time that must have elapsed in order to be eligible, and the application process.

In 2022 and again in 2023 the Utah legislature made a number of additional changes to the law, which is one of the most complex in the Nation.  Its basic provisions are described in sections A thrugh E below.   Suffice it to say that we have not attempted to capture all of the ins and outs of Utah expungement law in this document, and direct readers interested in additional information about eligibility and procedure to the website of Rasa. https://www.rasa-legal.com.

Clean slate: In 2019, the legislature enacted HB 431, a “clean slate” law that will provide for automatic expungement of a variety of non-conviction, infraction, and misdemeanor criminal records (and deletion of certain traffic records). The system came on line in February 2022. The “clean slate” law, which applied retroactively to cases adjudicated prior to its effective date, is described in detail at the conclusion of this section. Ms. Sudbury’s account of How Utah Got Automatic Expungement was published by CCRC on January 1, 2021.   

2022 and 2023 amendments: In 2022 S 35 made a number of amendments to Utah’s expungement laws, and renumbered most of the statutory provisions, as set forth in section A below.  Among other things, the law expands eligibility for automatic expungement under the 2019 Clean Slate Act to include qualifying dismissed charges, and eligibility for traffic offenses.  It also requires the Bureau of Criminal Identification (BCI) to provide information about the expungement petition process, dispenses with the requirement that petitioners first seek a “certificate of eligibility” in certain cases, prohibits a prosecutor from using an expunged record for sentencing enhancement or charging for a greater offense, and makes a large number of other procedural changes in the expungement system, including in use of expunged records. HB 392, also enacted in 2022, suspends payment of certain application costs for one year (see below) and requires the administrative office of the courts to issue a report by November 1 of each year, providing data on the number of expungements filed and granted, and the number of individuals who received at least one expungement.

In 2023, the Expungement Revisions (SB 293) made a number of additional changes to the expungement procedure, including to the procedure for obtaining a “certificate of eligibility” from the BCI with an eye toward expediting BCI consideration of this administrative stage of the process.

The Utah felony expungement process as it existed prior to the 2022 and 2023 amendments is analyzed and evaluated in detail in a July 2021 report by Noella Sudbury, Access Barriers to Felony Expungement in Utah, CCRC, July 16, 2021.  The report analyzes knowledge and resource barriers, eligibility barriers, process barriers, and effectiveness barriers. A number of the barriers identified in Sudbury’s 2021 report were ameliorated by the 2022 and 2023 amendments, but many were not.  Many of the strengths her report identifies remain in the law, such as the Utah’s 402 reduction process, which allows individuals who have more than the allowable single felony conviction to convert ineligible felony records into misdemeanor records, enabling a person to become eligible to expungement all of their records.   

A.  Convictions

Before a court will entertain an application for expungement of a criminal record, whether of a conviction oro a non-conviction record, an applicant must first obtain a Certificate of Eligibility from the Bureau of Criminal Identification (BCI) to signify their eligibility.  Utah Code § 77-40a-301.  The requirements for expungement of convictions provide that individuals shall not have been convicted of more than one felony, more than two Class A misdemeanors (in separate criminal episodes), more than three class B misdemeanors (same), or more than four convictions of any degree (excluding infractions and traffic offenses).  Eligibility is somewhat broader for drug convictions. Utah Code § 77-40a-303(1), (4) (renumbered from § 77-40-105(4).  If it has been 10 years since the petitioner was convicted of any offense or released from incarceration, probation, or parole, this numerical limit is increased by one.  See § 77-40a-303(7)(a).  Individuals who have more than the allowable single felony conviction can seek, and are often granted, reductions of felonies to misdemeanors under Utah Code § 76-3-402. See discussion of this unusual procedure below.  In March 2018, SB 62 clarified that the BCI is prohibited from counting pending or previous infractions, traffic offenses, or minor regulatory offenses when determining whether to grant a certificate of eligibility for expungement;

An eligibility determination includes considering a person’s entire criminal record, including convictions from out of state.  §§ 77-40a-303(4)-(6), 77-40a-304(1).  Infractions, traffic offenses, and “minor regulatory offenses'” (defined at §  77-40a-101(12) as any local ordinance offenses or Class B or C misdemeanor offenses not contained within the Criminal Code, with exceptions including drug possession, DUI, and reckless driving offenses) do not count against expungement eligibility.  § 77-40a-303(4) (added by SB-12, § 4 (2017) (recodified by S 35 (2022))). Fines and restitution must be paid before expungement may be ordered, a requirement that is rarely waived.  § 77-40a-303(1)(a) and (b). Application forms and instructions are available at http://www.utcourts.gov/howto/expunge/#district.

Eligibility periods for petitions

Per Utah Code Ann. § 77-40a-303(3)(c), eligibility periods running from release from supervision are: 

(a) seven years in the case of a felony (other than those identified in (b) and (c));

(b) ten years in the case of a misdemeanor or felony DUI offense or felony drug trafficking offense;

(c) five years in the case of a class A misdemeanor, or felony drug possession offense;

(d) four years in the case of a class B misdemeanor; or

(e) three years in the case of any other misdemeanor or infraction. 

In addition to these time periods, eligibility for expungement may be defeated by various combinations of prior offenses. In 2016 and again in 2017 the categories of offenses that may defeat eligibility were narrowed to exclude minor offenses and pardoned offenses.  In 2020, these eligibility periods and the requirement of a certificate of eligibility were made inapplicable to convictions for possession of marijuana for medicinal purposes. § 77-40a-306(1)(d).   

402 reduction (felonies to misdemeanors):  Individuals who have more than the allowable single felony conviction can seek, and are often granted, 402 reductions. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-402, described in Noella Sudbury’s report cited above. Utah’s Judicial Self-Help Center provides information and guidance about this so-called 402 process, and explains it is a common tool that can help individuals become eligible for an expungement. In addition, some local district attorneys have exercised their discretion to do bulk conviction reductions, changing large volumes of older felony offense records to misdemeanor ones, greatly expanding those eligible for felony expungement relief. See, e.g., Paighten Harkins, Salt Lake County is reducing the penalties in 13,929 drug cases, SL Tribune, September 24, 2019.

Payment of court debt: Utah requires all those seeking expungement by petition to show payment in full of all fines and restitution, Utah Code Ann. § 77-40a-303(1)(a) and (b), but only those related to the case for which expungement is sought.[note]  In March 2018, SB 62 clarified that only fines and interest ordered by the court related to a conviction for which expungement is sought must be paid in full before expungement may be ordered; and, that fines or fees arising from pending or previous infractions, traffic offenses, or minor regulatory offenses are not counted when determining expungement eligibility. §§ 77-40a-303(3)(a), (4). In 2021 the laws authorizing victim restitution were rewritten to give courts authority to consider a defendant’s indigency in imposing a restitution order, and to remove authority from the Board of Pardons and Paroles to order restitution, but reaffirming authority of the Department of Public Safety to consider whether a defendant has paid restitution before certifying eligibility for expungement.  See HB 260.[/note] In addition, automatic “clean slate” expungement is unavailable if a “criminal judgment accounts receivable” has not been satisfied or has been entered as a civil judgment and turned over to state debt collection office. Id.

See Utah Code §§ 77-40a-301 (overview); 77-40a-302 (Application for certificate of eligibility for convictions)77-40a-303 (Application for certificate of eligibility for non-conviction records); 77-40a-305 (Petition for expungement); 77-40a-306 (Order of expungement); 7-40a-401 (Distribution of order).  A petitioner must apply for and receive a “certificate of eligibility,” which is issued after investigation by the Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification, before filing it with a petition for expungement.  See  §§ 77-40a-302, 77-40a-107.   The process for obtaining a “certificate of eligibility” is explained on the website of the Bureau of Criminal Investigation at  View pamphlet Criteria for a “Certificate of Eligibility” (Overview of the Expungement Process).  The application form is accessible on the BCI website.  

In 2020, the requirement of a certificate of eligibility was made inapplicable to convictions for possession of marijuana for medicinal purposes, and in 2022 it was made inapplicable to additional cannabis offenses and traffic offenses. Also in 2020, HB397 specifically prohibited the BCI from considering minor prior or pending cases, or any clean-slate-eligible cases.  See § 77-40a-303(8), and below on clean slate.4

Application fees:  The statutory application fee is $50, with an additional $56 issue fee. See § 53-10-202.5(5).   

These fees, along with the fee payable to BCI for a certificate of eligibility, were temporarily suspended in 2022 by HB392, and restored in 2024 with a variety of provisions authorizing case-by-case waiver.  See HB352.    

The court must deliver a copy of the petition and certificate to the prosecuting agency.  The prosecuting attorney must notify the victim. §§ 77-40a-305(5) and (6). The court may request a written response from the Division of Adult Parole and Probation of the Department of Corrections, which shall include the reasons probation was terminated and certification that the petitioner has completed all requirements of sentencing and probation or parole.  §§ 77-40a-305(8)(a), (b).  A copy of this response is provided to the petitioner and the prosecuting attorney.  § 77-40a-305(8)(c). If the prosecutor or victim objects to the petition, or the Division of Adult Probation and Parole provides a written response, the petitioner may respond in writing within 14 days after receipt.  § 77-40a-305(9). This was reduced from 15 days by the 2023 amendments.

Upon objection from any party, the court sets a hearing, with notice provided to the petitioner, prosecuting attorney, and victim.  § 77-40a-305(10)(a).  If no objection is received within 60 days of the petition’s filing date, the court has authority to grant expungement without a hearing.  § 77-40a-305(11).   The 2022 revision of the law eliminated a provision seeming to require the court to issue an order of expungement if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the petition and certificate of eligibility are sufficient, statutory requirements are met, and that “it is not contrary to the interests of the public to grant the expungement.” Id. § 77-40a-305(8) (2021).

Effect of expungement: 

Utah’s Expungement Act provides that a person receiving an expungement “may respond to any inquiry as though the . . . conviction did not occur.”  Utah Code 77-40a-401(d)(2).  Prior to enactment of the 2022 law, an expunged conviction could be used for various law enforcement-related purposes, such as in subsequent sentencing, or eligibility for expungement of a future conviction, but now “a prosecuting attorney may not use an expunged record for the purpose of a sentencing enhancement or as a basis for charging an individual with an offense that requires a prior conviction,” except with leave of court.  § 77-40a-403(e). 

An expunged conviction may not be accessed by the Department of Professional Licensing for licensing purposes.  See Doe v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 782 P.2d 489 (Utah 1989) (Department of Public Safety could not ask about or obtain expunged convictions of applicant for employment with Department of Corrections; and expungement statute’s failure to limit rights of licensing agencies to receive information did not give Department right to expunged information).   The 2010 amendments to the Utah expungement law, which allowed employers to inquire about arrests or convictions only to the extent that they have not been expunged and the records sealed, appear to confirm the result in Doe.  The current text of the statute provides more generally that “[u]nless otherwise provided by law or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction to respond differently, an individual or agency who has received an expungement of an arrest or conviction under this chapter or Section 77-27.5.1 may respond to any inquiry as though the arrest or conviction did not occur.”  Utah Code Ann. § 77-40a-401(2).  See generally Michael D. Mayfield, Revisiting Expungement: Concealing Information in the Information Age, 1997 Utah L. Rev. 1057, 1058-60 (1997).  

A law enacted in 2019, HB 90 (effective May 14, 2019) makes clear that an applicant seeking employment from a private employer “may answer a question related to an expunged criminal record as though the action underlying the expunged criminal record never occurred.”  § 34-52-301.  The new law also clarifies that a public employer may not make an inquiry related to expunged criminal history—and an applicant may answer such a question “as though the action underlying the expunged criminal record never occurred,” except for the following preexisting exemptions for disclosure: (1) where federal, state, or local law “requires the consideration of an applicant’s criminal conviction history”; (2) where the public employer is a law enforcement agency, part of the criminal or juvenile justice system, works with children or vulnerable adults, whose primary purpose is performing financial or fiduciary functions, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, or the State Tax Commission; or (3) where the employer is seeking a non-employee volunteer.  § 34-52-201.  

Firearms restrictions are removed by expungement (if eligible) or pardon. § 76-10-503(1)(c).  

Assistance with expungement process: Assistance with determining eligibility for expungement and (if eligible) applying for expungement in Utah is available from Rasa Legal: https://www.rasa-legal.com/. 

B.  Pardoned offenses

As of May 14, 2013, “[u]pon granting a pardon, the board shall issue an expungement order, directing any criminal justice agency to remove the recipient’s identifying information relating to the expunged convictions from its records.”  Utah Code § 77-27-5.1(1).  A person pardoned prior to that date is entitled to expungement under the same authority. § 77-40a-303(9).  “An expungement order, issued by the board, has at least the same legal effect and authority as an order of expungement issued by a court, pursuant to Title 77.” § 77-27-5.1(2).  In 2017, § 77-27-5.1 was amended to provide that pardoned convictions do not count against expungement availability.  See SB-12, § 2 (2017).

C.  Victims of force, fraud or coercion 

Vacatur and expungement available on petition where offense committed while the petitioner subject to force, fraud, or coercion.  Eligible convictions include possession of a controlled substance, prostitution, criminal trespass, theft, possession of forged documents, unlawful possession of another’s identification documents, prostitution, or sexual solicitation. Utah Code Ann. §§ 78B-9-104(1)(h), 78B-9-108(2)(b).  Eligibility periods in Utah Code Ann. § 77-40a-303(3)(c) (above) appear to apply.   See also the 2019 law discussed below making juveniles eligible for vacatur of prostitution and related convictions. 

D.  Non-conviction record, including “plea in abeyance”

Clean Slate:  Utah’s 2019 clean slate law provides for an automated expungement process (effective May 1, 2020) for acquittals, dismissals with prejudice, certain dismissals due to a plea in abeyance agreement, and less serious misdemeanor convictions, as described below.

Pre-Clean Slate:  Utah Code Ann. 77-40a-302 (sections renumbered in the 2022 recodification).  A person arrested or formally charged with an offense may, at least 30 days after arrest, apply for a certificate of eligibility and petition for expungement if no charges are filed, if the charges are dismissed and the limitations period has expired on all charges, or if the person is acquitted.  No waiting period where person acquitted.  

In March 2018, eligibility criteria were expanded to permit expungement where the entire case is dismissed without prejudice or without condition AND (1) the prosecutor consents in writing to the issuance of a certificate of eligibility, OR (2) at least 180 days have passed since the date of dismissal. § 77-40a-302(c)(iii).  See SB 62. Under the amended law, the court is required to issue an order of expungement if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the prosecutor provided written consent and has not filed and does not intend to refile related charges.  The person seeking expungement may reapply for a certificate of eligibility if the court denies the original petition based on the prosecutor’s intent to refile charges and charges are not refiled within 180 days of the date the court denies the original petition. The prosecutor opposing expungement of a case dismissed without prejudice or without condition must have a good faith basis for the intention to refile the case. 

Plea in abeyance: Utah Code Ann. § 77-2a-1 et seq. provides a process whereby a court may accept a plea and withhold the judgment, put the person on probation pursuant to a plea in abeyance agreement, and ultimately expunge the record.  In 2020, HB 83 was enacted, providing that if an expungement is sought for a charge dismissed in accordance with a plea in abeyance agreement, the prosecutor must notify the victim, § 77-38-14; and providing that if an objection is filed, and the charge is one that is an offense eligible to be used for enhancement, the court shall determine if “there is good cause for the court to grant the expungement,” and “the interests of the public would not be harmed by granting the expungement.” § 77-40a-306(1)(e)-(f). 

Diversion:  Utah Code Ann. § 77-2-5 provides that at any time after the filing of an information or indictment and prior to conviction, the prosecuting attorney may, by written agreement with the defendant, filed with the court, and upon approval of the court, divert a defendant to a non-criminal diversion program.  Serious felonies, sexual offenses, domestic violence, and many traffic charges are not eligible.  § 77-2-9.  Upon successful completion of the program the charges are dismissed without a conviction.  § 77-2-6. 

E.  Juvenile records

In 2020 HR397 enacted the Juvenile Expungement Act, § 78A-6-1501 et seq., renumbering and making non-substantive changes in some provisions of earlier law, and a few major changes.  The following year, as part of recodification of all provisions affecting juveniles, Ch. 261, HB 285, these sections were all renumbered as § 80-6-1001 et seq.  A new § 80-6-1003 specified the effect of expungement. These have been further modified in 2023 by the Juvenile Justice Modifications (HB 60), described below.

Effective May 1, 2020, , upon reaching age 18, a person with a juvenile record is eligible for expungement following a one-year waiting period and either the juvenile court’s continuing jurisdiction has terminated or the individual was released from custody. The prior law also required completion of all sentence requirements, with a provision for waiver by the court.  § 80-6-1004.1 (formerly § 78A-6-1503). However, expungement is not available to individuals whose juvenile record contains an adjudication for murder. § 80-6-1004.1(6). After a hearing, the court may seal all of petitioner’s records within the juvenile court’s control if the individual has not, in the five years preceding, been convicted of a violent felony, still owe restitution, or have any proceedings pending.  § 80-6-1004.1(6).  Previously, expungement was unavailable to any person convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving “moral turpitude” subsequent to the termination of the juvenile court’s jurisdiction.  At the hearing, the victim, if any, will be given an opportunity to testify, § 80-6-1004.1(4)(c), and the court will consider whether the juvenile has been rehabilitated to the court’s satisfaction.  § 80-6-1004.1(5)(a).  Expungement seals the record, and it can be opened only by petitioning the court.  § 80-6-1006.1.  Applicable procedures require the petitioner to obtain and serve documents on numerous parties.

The 2020 law enacted a new provision on “Nonjudicial adjustment expungement” to allow any juvenile upon reaching age 18 to petition for expungement of all such dispositions if conditions have been completed, without a hearing. §  80-6-1004.2. This provision was amended in 2023 by HB 60, which provided for automatic expungement where the juvenile has complied with every nonjudicial adjustment. § 80-6-1004.5.

In 2023, HB 60 also added a provision for a person to petition for expungement of non-conviction records. § 80-6-1004.3. It also provided for juvenile records to be expunged upon petition where the adjudication did not result in conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. § 80-6-1004.4.

Vacatur for juvenile victims of human trafficking:  In 2019, a new provision § 78A-6-1114 was enacted creating a path to a clean record for a person with juvenile records related to prostitution and related offenses, if subject to “force, fraud, or coercion.”  See HB 108.  In 2021 this provision was renumbered § 80-6-1002 as part of the general recodification (see above). The law “clarifies that children who are engaged in commercial sex should be treated as victims.”  Persons seeking vacatur must file a petition to the court.  § 80-6-1002(1)(a).  The court will hold a hearing and allow prosecutors and victims to be heard if they appear.  § 80-6-1002(1)(e).  The “court shall presumptively grant vacatur” for prostitution, aiding prostitution, or sex solicitation records unless the juvenile purchased sexual activity.  § 80-6-1002(2)(b)(iii).  The court shall vacate other records if it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the juvenile was subject to force, fraud, or coercion at the time of the conduct.  § 80-6-1002(2)(b)(ii).  To prevent creating records in the future, HB 108 adds a provision to Utah’s sexual solicitation statute that prohibits law enforcement officials from initiating delinquency proceedings against children they encounter who are victims engaged in commercial sex or solicitation.  See § 76-10-1313(7).

F.  Frequency of expungement grants

According to the Office of Utah Court Administration, approximately half of all expungement petitions filed are granted. 

G.  Clean slate automatic process

Effective May 1, 2020, Utah’s 2019 clean slate law authorizes automatic expungement or deletion of certain non-conviction, infraction, and misdemeanor conviction records.  HB 431 (2019), as modified by HB352 (2024), codified in § 77-40a-101(7)(a) and (b).  As reenacted in 2024, automated relief applies both to cases adjudicated on or after May 1, 2020, and to cases adjudicated before that date.  Utah Code § 77-40a-103 (2024).   The system came online in February 2022. An online portal will be available to individuals to determine their eligibility, which will serve as notice of expungement pending a records check to ensure that the record has in fact been cleared.   In 2024 clean slate authority was extended by HB352 between 2024 and 2026, and the eligibility criteria recodified in renumbered provisons.  See § 77-40a-101(7)(a)(convictions) and (b)(non-convictions) (2024).  

Non-conviction records:  See above for eligibility, which is extended to In 2024 clean slate authority was extended between 2024 and 2026, and the eligibility criteria for automatic expungement of cases of acquittal or dismissal with prejudice (§ 77-40a-206) or arrests or charges (§ 77-40a-302). 

Misdemeanor and plea in abeyance records:  With respect to convictions and cases dismissed following a plea in abeyance, only cases defined as “clean slate eligible cases” are eligible for automatic expungement. § 77-40a-104.  Each conviction within the case—or if the case is dismissed as a result of successful completion of a plea in abeyance agreement under § 77-2a-3(2)(b), each charge within the case—must either be

(A) a misdemeanor conviction for possession of a controlled substance under § 58-37-8(2)(a)(i);5. 

(B) a class B or class C misdemeanor conviction; or

(C) an infraction conviction

In addition, several additional criteria must be satisfiedm including payment of all court debt and waiting periods that are longer than for opetition-based sealing:

• Each conviction within the case—or if the case is dismissed as a result of successful completion of a plea in abeyance agreement under § 77-2a-3(2)(b), each charge within the case—must either be (A) a misdemeanor conviction for possession of a controlled substance under § 58-37-8(2)(a)(i); (B) a class B or class C misdemeanor conviction; or (C) an infraction conviction;
• The person must not have been found in the case to be not guilty by reason of insanity;
• The person must be no criminal proceedings pending against them in the state;
• The person must not have been convicted of specified combinations of prior misdemeanor and felony offenses in Utah state courts—excluding infractions, traffic offenses, or minor regulatory offenses7.  The Judicial Council is authorized to make rules governing the identification and processing of cases.  § 77-40a-201, -202, -203(2). 

March 2021 status report:

  • “Implementation was temporarily stalled due to COVID-19. Utah stakeholders are now back on track and anticipate automated record clearing will begin this summer.”
  • “According to very preliminary and confidential estimates from Code for America, we predict that over 200,000 people in Utah have a Clean Slate eligible conviction record.  When combined with non-conviction records, it is estimated that close to 10% of all Utahns will be eligible for some form of Clean Slate relief.”
  • “Notification: while the law is projected to have high impact, it does not have a notification requirement, meaning people with eligible records will not be directly notified that one or all of their criminal case records have been cleared. In addition, survey data from statewide expungement events shows that 65% of people with records report that they have not heard of Utah’s Clean Slate law.”

I.  Judicial certificate – Termination of sex offender registration

Under Utah Code § 77-41-112, as amended in 2019, a court may terminate a person’s obligation to register as a sex offender five years after completion of sentence and a number of other conditions; and ten years after the person is placed on probation or parole, or released from prison without parole.

J.  Contact

Office of Court Administration – Court Data Processing
801-238-7013

IV.  Criminal record in employment & licensing

A.  Ban-the-box in public employment

As of May 8, 2017, public employers may not require an applicant to disclose convictions on an employment application or before an initial interview. Utah Code Ann. § 34-52-201(1) – (2). (enacted by HB-156 (2017)).  If no interview is conducted, an employer may not require disclosure until after a conditional offer of employment is made.  § 34-52-201(2)(c). The law covers the state (and its agencies and subunits), state institutions of higher education, and municipalities and other political subdivisions of the state.  § 34-52-102(3). The law does not apply in the following cases:

(a) if federal, state, or local law, including corresponding administrative rules, requires the consideration of an applicant’s criminal conviction history;

(b) to a public employer that is a law enforcement agency;

(c) to a public employer that is part of the criminal or juvenile justice system;

(d) to a public employer seeking a nonemployee volunteer;

(e) to a public employer that works with children or vulnerable adults;

(f) to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control created in Section 32B-2-203;

(g) to the State Tax Commission; and

(h) to a public employer whose primary purpose is performing financial or fiduciary functions.

§ 34-52-201(4).

B.  Licensing

In 2019 and again in 2020, Utah amended its laws relating to consideration of criminal conviction in licensure, and the resulting scheme is quite robust in ensuring fair treatment of people with a criminal record. An occupational or professional license may be denied, or restricted, where an applicant or licensee has engaged in “unprofessional conduct”  Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-1-304, 58-1-401.  “Unprofessional conduct” includes engaging in

“conduct that results in conviction, a plea of nolo contendere, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere which is held in abeyance pending completion of probation with respect to a crime of moral turpitude or any other crime that, when considered with the functions and duties of the occupation or profession for which the license was issued or is to be issued, bears a substantial relationship to the licensee’s or applicant’s ability to safely or competently practice the occupation or profession.”

§ 58-1-501(2), as amended in 2019 by HB90 (2019)(changing “reasonable relationship” to “substantial relationship”). “Unprofessional conduct” is further detailed in Utah Admin. Code R156-1-401 to include various aggravating and mitigating factors.

Preliminary determination: HB490 also authorized persons with a criminal record to apply at any time for a determination of whether their record would disqualify them from obtaining a license in any occupation or profession regulated by Title 58 of the Utah code (Title 58 extends, inter alia, to medical and health care professionals, architects and builders, cosmetologists, funeral service providers, hunting guides, pharmacists, athletic agents, geologists, music therapists, and persons authorized to distribute and conduct research with controlled substances).  § 58-1-310 (“Application for Division Determination Regarding Criminal Conviction”).  A fee may be charged.  Within 30 days of receipt of a completed application, the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing must make a written determination, and a negative decision may include additional steps the individual could take to qualify.  Id. 

The legislature has removed “good moral character” requirements from almost all specific licensing requirements.  See, e.g., SB 43 (2022).

Standards: In 2020, new standards were established for consideration of licensure of applicants with criminal records. See SB201. A new subsection (7) of § 58-1-401 provides that boards will “provide individualized consideration to the applicant or licensee,” and “determine whether the criminal conviction bears a substantial relationship to the applicant’s or licensee’s ability to safely or competently practice the occupation or profession.”  In making the “substantial relationship” determination the board will “consider the applicant’s or licensee’s current circumstances” measured by a number of the customary factors such as age when offense committed, time since conviction, etc. and various indicia of rehabilitation.  Applicants are provided an opportunity to appeal a denial. § 58-1-402.

Certain convictions are per se “not evidence of unprofessional conduct,” including non-convictions, and convictions where seven years have passed since release from incarceration without a conviction or guilty plea.  Convictions for violent and sexual crimes, and for fraud or embezzlement are excepted. § 58-1-501(4)(b)(ii).

Also in 2020, the legislature relaxed the record-related disqualification standards for people working with direct access to certain vulnerable adults, if their only disability is mental illness. See HB436, Section 16, amending § 26A-2-120(5)(c) and (6) (certain felonies are not disqualifying after 10 conviction-free years, and misdemeanors after three years).

Background investigations for licensing:  The Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) is specifically authorized to conduct background investigations of applicants for licensure in the following professions, including records in possession of the FBI: pharmacy (§ 58-17b-307), nursing (§ 58-31b-302), massage therapy (§ 58-47b-302), construction trades such as alarm companies and agents (§ 58-55-302), security personnel (§ 58-63-302), medical professionals (§ 58-67-302), osteopaths (§ 58-68-302), and “deception detection examiners” (§ 58-64-302).  DOPL is specifically authorized to consider “pleas of nolo contendere, pleas of guilty or nolo contendere held in abeyance, dismissed charges, and charges without a known disposition.”  See § 58-1-301.5.  

DOPL is not among the agencies authorized under § 77-40a-403(4) to receive information contained in expunged records, and the statutes authorizing background checks for the above-listed professions do not specifically mention expunged records.   And, the Utah courts have held that an expunged conviction may not be accessed for licensing purposes.  See Doe v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 782 P.2d 489 (Utah 1989) (Department of Public Safety could not ask about or obtain expunged convictions of applicant for employment with Department of Corrections; and expungement statute’s failure to limit rights of licensing agencies to receive information did not give Department right to expunged information). 

 

 

  1. Until 1998 persons convicted of a felony could vote in Utah.  See 1998 Utah Laws Ch. 266 (H.B. 190).  Under the amendments to the law that year, persons convicted of a felony were prohibited from voting, but the mechanisms enacted to restore this right excepted people with federal and out-of-state offenses from the relief extended to those convicted in Utah state courts.  See id.  In 2006, the Utah Legislature corrected this gap in the law by identifying a “convicted felon” as a person convicted in “any state or federal court of the United States.”  See 2006 Utah Laws Ch. 28 (S.B. 47).  This clarification guarantees that the proper legal mechanism exists to ensure that the right to vote is automatically restored for all persons convicted of a felony in Utah upon release from prison. 
  2. Until 1993 amendment, these restrictions did not apply to target concessions, shooting ranges, competitions, and hunting.  These exceptions are now available only to people with juvenile offenses.  See 1993 Utah Laws 2nd Sp. Sess. Ch. 10 (S.B. 2).  See also Utah Code §§ 76-10-509, 76-10-512.
  3. Until 1992 constitutional amendment, the Board of Pardons consisted of the governor, the Attorney General, and the Justices of the Supreme Court. similar to Nevada.  See Utah Const. art. VII, § 12 (1991); 1992 Utah Laws Sen. Jt. Res. 8.  See also Guide to Executive Clemency Among the American States, Nat’l Governors’ Ass’n 149-50 (1988).
  4. According to a report issued in 2016, the BCI has turned away numerous applicants based on minor prior offenses, causing an increase in the number of people applying for the alternative relief of pardon.  See Section II, above.
  5. The original intent of the legislature was to make only marijuana possession convictions eligible; however, the underlying case documentation did not always specify which drug was involved, so it was determined to extend eligibility to all controlled substances.
  7. A person is not eligible if the person has any of the following combinations of Utah state convictions on their record: two felony convictions from separate episodes, excluding drug possession; three convictions from separate episodes of which two are class A misdemeanor convictions, excluding drug possession; four convictions from separate episodes of which three are class B misdemeanor convictions, excluding drug possession; five convictions from separate episodes, excluding drug possession; three felony drug possession convictions from separate episodes; or five drug possession convictions from separate episodes.  § 77-40a-101(5).[note];

     


    • The case must not have an outstanding criminal judgment “accounts receivable” (defined in § 77-32a-101 to include “any amounts owed by a criminal defendant arising from a criminal judgment that has not been paid,” including fines, costs and restitution), even if it has been entered as a civil judgment and transferred to the Office of State Debt Collection;

     


    • The following time periods must have elapsed from the day on which the case was adjudicated: (1) at least 5 years for a class C misdemeanor or an infraction; (2) at least 6 years for a class B misdemeanor; and (3) at least 7 years for a class A conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 58-37-8(2)(a)(i); and

     


    • The case must not include a conviction or plea held in abeyance for specified categories of offenses, including any felony or Class A misdemeanor (other than drug possession), or crimes involving violence, sexual assault, weapons, domestic violence, or DUI.

§ 77-40a-101(4).

Clean slate process:  Now that the clean slate law has taken effect, prosecuting agencies will receive on a monthly basis notice of any case prosecuted by that agency that appears to be a clean slate eligible case.  § 77-40a-201(4). Within 35 days, the prosecuting agency must provide written notice (according to rules made by the Judicial Council) if the agency objects to automatic expungement because the case is not clean slate eligible, including because the individual has not paid court-ordered restitution, or because the agency has “a reasonable belief, grounded in supporting facts,” that the individual “is continuing to engage in criminal activity within or outside of the state.”  If the prosecuting agency timely provides such a notice, “the court may not proceed with automatic expungement.”  If no notice is sent, and a district or justice court determines that the requirements for automatic expungement have been met, the court must issue an expungement order, without any petition required.  The court must—based on information available—notify the Bureau of Criminal Identification and prosecuting agency of the order of expungement; the bureau must notify all law enforcement agencies identified in the case of the order of expungement.  In addition, a person may file a petition to expunge records that are eligible for automatic expungement, if automatic expungement has not occurred.  § 77-40a-201(1).

Traffic cases:  Records for the following traffic cases “shall be deleted” without a court order or notice to the prosecuting agency: (1) a case that resulted in an acquittal on all charges; (2) a case dismissed with prejudice (other than as a result of successful completion of a plea in abeyance agreement); and, as revised in 2022, (3) a traffic offense that is either a B misdemeanor after five years or a C misdemeanor after six years. § 77-40a-202. 

Implementation/including retroactivity:  The automated aspect of the 2019 law applies both to cases adjudicated on or after May 1, 2020, and to cases adjudicated before that date, with two separate procedures established. §§ 77-40a-203(1)(a) and (1)(b).  Soecific goals for automated expungement were repealed in 2024 by HB352.6 “Reasonable efforts within available funding shall be made to expunge or delete a case as quickly as is practicable” with the following goals:

• For non-conviction cases adjudicated on or after May 1, 2020, the goal is to expunge a case that resulted in an acquittal on all charges 60 days after the acquittal, and to expunge a case that resulted in a dismissal with prejudice (other than a case dismissed with prejudice as a result of successful completion of a plea in abeyance agreement) 180 days after either the day on which the entire case against the individual is dismissed with prejudice if no appeal was filed, or the date of a final non-appealable order;
• For “clean slate eligible cases” adjudicated on or after May 1, 2020, the goal is to delete a traffic clean slate eligible case upon identification, and to expunge a non-traffic clean slate eligible case within 30 days of the court determining that the requirements for expungement have been satisfied; and
• For cases adjudicated prior to May 1, 2020, the goal is to expunge or delete a case within one year of the day on which the case is identified as eligible for automatic expungement or deletion.

§ 77-40-a-203(1)(repealed by HB352 in 2024)