Former Obama officials advocate against FBI checks by (some) employers
Last week we posted a letter sent by former Attorney General Eric Holder to the Chicago City Council on behalf of Uber and Lyft, urging that it not require Uber and Lyft to subject their drivers to FBI fingerprint-based background checks applicable to taxi operators. His main argument was that FBI records are incomplete and misleading, and that they have a discriminatory impact on minorities. It now turns out that the campaign to free these ride-sharing companies from regulatory restrictions is broad-based: Holder has reportedly written to officals in New Jersey and Atlanta considering similar measures, and other former Obama officials are also working for Uber.
Holder’s former chief of staff, Margaret Richardson, now counsel to his firm Covington and Burling, serves on Uber’s safety advisory board. Former Congressman Howard Berman, also with Covington, has been working on behalf of Uber to defeat similar measures under consideration in California. Former Obama campaign manager David Plouffe is a “strategic adviser” for Uber and a member of the company’s board of directors.
Uber and Lyft have historically fought the mandated fingerprinting that many municipalities require of taxi operators, arguing that their own screening methods are better suited to a business model that relies on the fast recruitment of large numbers of drivers. Uber pulled out of Austin, Texas, rather than comply with driver screening requirements imposed by that city.
Holder’s fairness arguments seem to have equal application to other professions whose employees are screened by fingerprint based background checks. Efforts to improve the accuracy of FBI records have made little headway in Congress over the years, because of the cost of policing state record-keeping. At the same time, background screening providers have lobbied against regulatory measures that would limit what they can report to employers and licensing entities.
In a few weeks the Uniform Law Commission will be considering a model law on accuracy of criminal records, and the arguments made by Uber’s high-profile lobbyists will likely be taken into account. On the table will be a “decay” feature that would preclude consideration of arrest records not resulting in conviction after a oeriod of time. If adopted and enforced by states, such a provision would go a long way toward fixing the problems in FBI records identified by Mr. Holder.
- PA high court holds sex offender registration unconstitutional - July 19, 2017
- Sex offender consequences in the Supreme Court – what’s ahead? - July 18, 2017
- Fair Credit Reporting Act applied to criminal records - July 18, 2017
- Introducing the new Restoration of Rights Project - June 28, 2017
- Defendant entitled to “Hail Mary” effort to avoid deportation - June 24, 2017
- Scholarship round-up IV - June 23, 2017
- “Justice Alito’s misleading claim about sex offender rearrests” - June 22, 2017
- Court rules sex offenders cannot be barred from social media - June 20, 2017
- Introducing the Compilation of Federal Collateral Consequences - June 15, 2017
- “Back to Business” – A report on fair chance hiring policies - June 13, 2017